Skip to footer

'Lee Daniels' The Butler' is too ambitious but some moments hit home

( PG-13 ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

'The Butler' actors Forest Whitaker and Oprah Winfrey both turn in commendable performances.

|
Anne Marie Fox/The Weinstein Company/AP
Oprah Winfrey (l.) and Forest Whitaker (r.) star in 'Lee Daniels' The Butler.'
  • By Peter Rainer Film critic

“Lee Daniels' The Butler” – that’s the official title but we can just call it “The Butler” – is about Cecil Gaines (Forest Whitaker), a server at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. between 1957 and 1986.  His story is loosely based on the life of Eugene Allen, a White House butler who died in 2010. Cecil’s life spans his boyhood in the brutally segregated South to the election of President Obama. His wife, Gloria, played by Oprah Winfrey in her first dramatic role since 1998’s “Beloved,” stands by him through all the tumult – the Freedom Rides and the assassinations and race riots. Their son Louis (David Oyelowo) regards Cecil as an Uncle Tom and becomes radicalized in the Black Power movement. Gloria battles alcoholism. Throughout it all, amid much indignity, Cecil maintains his pride.

Ungainly and overly ambitious, “The Butler” tries to encompass too much history within too narrow a framework. Daniels utilizes Cecil as a "Zelig"-like character to reflect three decades of social and racial upheaval. Although Whitaker gives a sturdy, commendable performance, his character is made to bear too much symbolic weight. And having a parade of presidents hurried through the piece – played none too convincingly by Robin Williams (Eisenhower), James Marsden (Kennedy), Liev Schreiber (Johnson), John Cusack (Nixon), and Alan Rickman (Reagan) – only adds to the film’s once-over-lightly, flashcard quality.

Winfrey is good, though, demonstrating yet again that she’s an actress and not just a celebrity playing an actress. Moments in this film, particularly in the aftermath of the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., hit home. Given the subject matter, how could they not? But it’s also a bit weird – almost Pirandellian -- watching Winfrey play a woman who cries during Obama’s election victory speech. In that moment, it’s unavoidable: We’re not watching Gloria, we’re watching Oprah, the president’s close friend and major touter. Grade: B- (Rated PG-13 for some violence and disturbing images, language, sexual material, thematic elements and smoking.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to 'Lee Daniels' The Butler' is too ambitious but some moments hit home
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2013/0816/Lee-Daniels-The-Butler-is-too-ambitious-but-some-moments-hit-home
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe