Skip to footer

Oscars 2013: Who will win? Check out our predictions

The biggest night for movies is coming up fast – the ceremony will air on Feb. 24. Check out our picks for who will take home the big prizes.

5. Best Picture

Claire Folger/Warner Bros. Pictures/AP

  • By Molly Driscoll Staff Writer

The contenders:

–"Amour"
–"Argo"
–"Beasts Of The Southern Wild"
–"Django Unchained"
–"Les Misérables"
–"Life Of Pi"
–"Lincoln"
–"Silver Linings Playbook"
–"Zero Dark Thirty"

The verdict: The Best Picture race turned into one of the oddest in recent memory as post-Oscars-announcements awards ceremonies began. The prize was  regarded at first as a showdown between "Lincoln" and "Zero Dark Thirty," but after "Argo" director Ben Affleck lost out on a Best Director nomination, the tide suddenly swung in the favor of the film about the 1979 Iranian hostage crisis, with the movie picking up the Best Cast award at the SAGs, the Best Motion Picture, Drama award at the Golden Globes, and virtually every other prize that serves as a forecaster for Best Picture. The last time a movie won Best Picture without its director picking up their own statuette was 2006, when director Ang Lee won the prize for "Brokeback Mountain" but "Crash" won Best Picture. However, "Argo" looks to be the frontrunner to take home the big prize, meaning it will now be an upset if a movie first regarded as an underdog doesn't win.

5 of 5
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.