The Invisible War: movie review

( Unrated ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

The issue of rape in the US military is explored in this essential documentary.

|
Courtesy of Cinedigm/Docurama Films
Kori Cioca, a member of the US Coast Guard, is one of the subjects interviewed in 'The Invisible War.'

I have rarely been more righteously riled up than I was while watching the documentary "The Invisible War," winner of the audience award at the 2012 Sundance Film Festival. Amazingly, it's the first film to really explore the issue of rape in the US military. The fact that this subject has taken so long to achieve full-scale exposure is itself symptomatic of the problem.

Director Kirby Dick and his producing partner, Amy Ziering, expert muckrakers, first read about this sickening, endemic phenomenon in a 2007 Salon article, "The Private War of Women Soldiers," by Helen Benedict. In following up on their own research, the filmmakers contacted more than 150 women and ended up with a dozen subjects. They reported that the airing of the women's traumas, often for the first time in public, was validating – cathartic – for many of them.

A few facts: According to the Department of Defense, a female soldier is more likely to be raped by a fellow soldier than killed by enemy fire. In 2010 there were an estimated 19,000 violent sex crimes in the military. Of all active-duty female soldiers, 20 percent are sexually assaulted, with women between the ages of 18 and 21 making up more than half the victims. (One percent of men in the military, or about 20,000 men, were reportedly sexually assaulted in 2009. "The Invisible War" also features an interview with one such soldier.)

It is estimated that 80 percent of victims do not report the crimes against them, not surprising since fewer than 10 percent of assault cases are prosecuted. Often the victim, without the option of bringing her case to an outside criminal justice system, ends up being judged within the military by the perpetrators or allies of the perpetrators.

The testimony in "The Invisible War" gives these statistics a forcefulness that no catalog of woes could compete with. Perhaps the most powerful testimony comes from Kori Cioca, a former US Coast Guard seaman who was beaten and raped by her supervisor, who admitted to the attack but not the rape and received 30 days of base restriction and loss of pay. Despite having post-traumatic stress disorder and sustaining an irreparably fractured jaw, Cioca had her medical claims denied. (After the film's Sundance screening, a couple approached the producers and offered to pay all her medical bills.) Cioca ended up as a plaintiff in an unsuccessful class action civil suit against the Department of Defense.

Then there is Trina McDonald, who was repeatedly drugged and raped by military police at a remote Naval Operating Station in Alaska's Aleutian Islands. Or Lt. Ariana Klay, a decorated Iraq war veteran who was assaulted by a senior officer and her civilian boss in the prestigious Marine Barracks Washington. The officialese spoken in the face of these atrocities is doubly incensing.

Two days after watching "The Invisible War" April 14, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta directed commanders to hand over all sexual assault investigations to a higher-ranked colonel, and he announced the establishment of a Special Victims Unit for all military branches. These acts should only be the beginning of reparations.

"The Invisible War" is not an anti-military movie. Quite the contrary. What it is saying is that these soldiers, who still revere its ideals, deserve better. They, and all who come after them, deserve justice. Grade: A (Unrated.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to The Invisible War: movie review
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2012/0627/The-Invisible-War-movie-review
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe