Why England has 200 countesses – and zero counts

There are many – countless? – counts in the rest of Europe, but in Britain the husband of a countess is an earl. Scholars disagree about why.

|
Staff

King Charles III’s coronation brought renewed attention to the British monarchy and the peerage system in which it is enmeshed. Let’s continue the examination of aristocratic titles we began last week.

There are nearly 200 countesses in the United Kingdom, but no counts. There are many – countless? – counts in the rest of Europe, but in Britain the husband of a countess is an earl. Scholars disagree about why. Linguist Geoffrey Hughes says the originally Anglo-Norman word count was fine in French but was too similar to a vulgar one for the medieval English nobility. It seems more likely, though, that the English didn’t reject count so much as hold on to earl – the highest noble title before the Norman invasion of 1066.

These early earls were the most powerful of the king’s vassals and could rule large areas of land. As the Normans reshaped the aristocracy, earl went from being the top of the hierarchy to the middle. Old English didn’t have gendered titles – the only woman who could have any title was the cwen, or “queen,” and this word can also mean “woman” and “wife.” So when Normans introduced the concept of aristocratic power couples, the wife of an earl became a countess.

The next rank down, oddly, is viscount (VIGH-count). The prefix is the Latin vice-, meaning “in place of.” Just as the vice president steps in if the president is incapacitated, a viscount was originally a sort of deputy count. The first English viscount appeared in 1440, but according to Debrett’s Perage, a guide to the history and current holders of British titles, the rank wasn’t “popular” until the 1600s.

The late Latin word baro, like homo, simply meant “man.” Baron thus described a “king’s man” – a military leader in royal service – and arrived in French and English as the lowest rung on the ladder of aristocracy. Baron is the only peerage title to be used more widely: Since the 1800s, baron has been applied to successful business people, usually with connotations of ruthlessness, as in “newspaper baron” or “robber baron.”

Baronets (the -et suffix is diminutive, as in kitchenette) occupy a middle ground. They are “noble,” according to tradition, but not members of the peerage and thus not eligible to sit in the House of Lords. King James I created the title in 1611 to bolster the Crown’s finances: He bestowed it on anyone who “donated” a lot of money to his wars in Ireland. 

Below barons and baronets were bachelors, or “common people,” so called partly because medieval writers loved the alliteration of those three B’s. Today this is a slightly old-fashioned-sounding term for a man without a wife; in the Middle Ages it was a man without a title, too.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why England has 200 countesses – and zero counts
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/In-a-Word/2023/0522/Why-England-has-200-countesses-and-zero-counts
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe