Skip to footer

Giuliana Rancic expecting, joins celeb surrogate trend

Giuliana Rancic, the E! News host, says she and husband, Bill Rancic, are expecting their first child, via gestational surrogate, this summer.

|
AP
Bill and Giuliana Rancic and Bill Rancic are expecting their first child via a gestational surrogate.

Giuliana Rancic, the host of E! News, and her businessman husband Bill Rancic,  announced yesterday that they are having a baby. And the internet is going crazy.

See, Ms. Rancic’s isn’t just another celebrity pregnancy.  In fact, Giuliana isn’t really, technically, traditionally, pregnant at all. 

After years of struggling to conceive – the emotions around which they shared on their Style Network reality series “Giuliana & Bill" (strange world, no?) – the couple said yesterday that a gestational surrogate would be giving birth to their child this summer.

“We are so thrilled that our prayers have been answered,” they wrote in a statement. “We are absolutely ecstatic to be sharing this with everyone who has been following our journey.”

Surrogacy – where another woman carries a couple’s child, either with her own or an implanted embryo – is one of the more controversial methods of infertility treatment in the US. And if you go by celebrity news, it seems to be increasingly common:

Over the past couple of years, Nicole Kidman and husband Keith Urban had a baby daughter via surrogate (January); Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick had twins (June 2009); and Elton John and partner David Furnish had a baby boy (Christmas Day).

The statistics for gestational surrogacy in the US show a wider increase, as well. The Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Centers for Disease Control report the number of infants born to gestational surrogates increased to 1,400 in 2008 from 738 in 2004.  (Some groups involved in surrogacy – both pro and con – say they believe these numbers are low.)

Gestational surrogacy makes up a small percentage of the babies born from other types of intense fertility treatment. According to the CDC, which reviewed data from 441 fertility clinics nationwide, 60,190 infants were born after Assisted Reproductive Technology, the term that describes all treatments that involve handling women’s eggs or embryos, including in vitro fertilization. But it has received some of the most intense criticism.

Some critics have speculated that surrogacy would become the new vanity C-section for the Hollywood set, with women who don’t want to go through the “inconvenience” of pregnancy and childbirth simply outsourcing those duties to another, usually lower income, woman. Others worry about the ethical implications for the surrogate; still others wonder about the religious implications of the scientific management of childbirth.

But for parents such as the Rancics, who did not conceive after in vitro fertilization, surrogacy means one thing: joy.

Ms. Rancic called their gestational carrier “a dream come true.”

“To finally get that call from the doctor that you’re pregnant and you’re having a baby.... It was just another world,” she said.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Giuliana Rancic expecting, joins celeb surrogate trend
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Family/Modern-Parenthood/2012/0424/Giuliana-Rancic-expecting-joins-celeb-surrogate-trend
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe