Two million Calif. adults living with parents

A new study finds job losses, divorce, and home foreclosures have more than two million adult Californians returning to their childhood homes to live with their parents.

|
Jeff Chiu/AP
A new study finds that more than two million adults in California have returned to their childhood homes to live with family, citing job losses, divorces, and home foreclosure among the biggest reasons. A man crosses Stockton Street in San Francisco, Wednesday, Feb. 26.

More than 2.3 million adult children are living with their parents in California, a 63 percent increase since the Great Recession began seven years ago and a phenomenon straining budgets and pushing some families to the brink of poverty, according to a study released Thursday.

Researchers from UCLA and the Oakland-based Insight Center for Community Economic Development say job losses, home foreclosures, and divorces are among the factors driving hundreds of thousands of adults to return to their childhood homes. In many cases, those homes are headed by parents who are approaching or in retirement, and are living on fixed incomes themselves.

"There were 433,000 older adults, age 65 and over, who housed approximately 589,000 of those adult children," the researchers said in the report released by the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. Those figures were generated from federal census statistics, said the report's lead author, Steven P. Wallace.

Of those adult children living with older parents, researchers found that only about 42 percent were employed, putting a significant strain on the parents to provide not only housing, but also necessities like food, medical care, and transportation for them. To do so for just one adult child, the study found, costs the average couple about 2 1/2 times more per year than they would pay just to take care of themselves.

Exacerbating that problem is the already high cost of living in California, said Mr. Wallace, who is also the UCLA center's associate director.

While qualification for many public assistance programs is based on federal poverty level standards, he said, those standards are calculated on the average cost-of-living for the country as a whole.

Under federal poverty level standards, for example, an older couple renting a home would be expected to cover all expenses on $14,710 a year. But researchers found in 2011, the most recent year for which statistics were available, that just renting a one-bedroom apartment in San Francisco would cost $17,580 a year.

They estimated that an older couple living with one adult child would need about $54,000 a year to live in San Francisco. In Southern California's Orange County, the cost would be about $52,000, and in San Diego County it would be $48,691. In less expensive areas like San Bernardino and Riverside counties, it would still be about $35,000.

Among other things, the study recommends Supplemental Security Income benefits and food assistance programs for older people be increased, more housing for seniors be provided and that low-income adult children be encouraged to apply for health insurance through the state's Medi-Cal program.

In the meantime, Wallace said California residents shouldn't expect adult children will move out any time soon.

"Right now the economy isn't generating jobs fast enough to soak up a lot of the people who have either lost their jobs or are coming into the job market," he said. "The near future looks like the numbers are likely to remain stable or grow."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Two million Calif. adults living with parents
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Family/2014/0228/Two-million-Calif.-adults-living-with-parents
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe