Twitter use in classrooms grows

Teachers and students in nine states are taking part in a program by KQED public radio, which posts weekly topics, videos, and articles designed to stimulate Twitter conversations. Some parents are skeptical, but students are taking interest in online discussions about current events.

|
KQED Education/YouTube
This image from the from the KQED Education video on YouTube about the "Do Now" program, shows a student tweeting their thoughts in response to a current news event.

Chris Lazarski watched his students interact with Twitter and other social media sites in class, and didn't order them to close their laptops or put away their cellphones. Instead, he encouraged them to keep going.

"Keep tweeting – it's free," he said. "Keep those comments going."

Many school officials frown upon students tweeting in class, but others have embraced social media as a learning tool. They say sites like Twitter can enhance learning by expanding classroom discussions to include input from thousands of other students across the nation.

Mr. Lazarski, who teaches public policy at Wauwatosa West High School in suburban Milwaukee, Wis., is using Twitter in classroom conversations about current events.

During a recent class, he spent about 20 minutes discussing zero-tolerance policies in high school and then invited students to log on to continue the conversation through classroom Twitter accounts.

"Let's get our tweet on," said Lazarski, 41, and the room fell silent except for the sound of clacking keyboards. The 29 students tweeted their thoughts – in a short sentence or two. Some targeted industry experts while others retweeted articles that elaborated on their own viewpoints.

Lazarski's classroom exercise is part of a larger program organized by KQED, a public television station in San Francisco, and used by more than 120 teachers in California, Oregon, Kentucky, Texas, Illinois, Wisconsin, Michigan, West Virginia and New York. The KQED "Do Now" program posts weekly topics, videos and articles designed to stimulate Twitter conversations.

Tim Olson, the vice president of digital media and education at KQED, said Twitter enhances discussions involving elections, politics and international events because students across multiple geographic regions can raise thoughtful arguments that may be absent from more homogenous classrooms.

Lazarski said he avoids relying too much on Twitter, which is why he starts the lessons with an oral discussion.

While students seemed to enjoy the exercise, some parents weren't crazy about the idea. Katie Bradley, whose daughter is in Lazarski's class, said she won't let her 16-year-old have a personal Twitter account and she has concerns about classroom tweeting because posts are permanent.

"I don't want her to burn any bridges for her future" said Mr. Bradley, 42. "I would hate, hate for a terrible decision that she made as a teenager to affect her future."

The Do Now program is geared toward high school students, but even elementary school teachers have been experimenting with blogs and Twitter.

Kathy Cassidy teaches first grade at Westmount Elementary School in Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan, Canada. Her 20 students use a classroom Twitter account to communicate with a first-grade class in Milan, Italy, and also to post photos of class artwork and other activities.

"Nothing gets tweeted unless I see it first, and we don't put up pictures where someone might be able to identify a child," Ms. Cassidy said. "We've had a couple of parents who questioned the safety of what we were doing, but once they realized all the safety things we have in place they're fine with it."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Twitter use in classrooms grows
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Family/2014/0124/Twitter-use-in-classrooms-grows
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe