Skip to footer

Texting and driving: N.H. high court seeks teen input

New Hampshire's highest court is holding a series of public hearings at colleges and high schools to hear from teens about whether reading a text message while driving should be considered reckless and warrant a prison sentence.

|
Pat Wellenbach/AP/File
New Hampshire's highest court went to a high school to hear arguments in a case it thought would resonate with the more than 500 students in the audience: Whether reading a text message while driving can amount to recklessness worthy of a prison sentence.
  • By Lynne Tuohy Associated Press

| Concord, N.H.

New Hampshire's highest court went to a high school to hear arguments in a case it thought would resonate with the more than 500 students in the audience: Whether reading a text message while driving can amount to recklessness worthy of a prison sentence.

The dozens of students who lined up at two microphones to question the lawyers after Thursday's arguments suggested they'd picked a winner.

"The students feel invested in the cellphone case," said Brenda Barth, a history teacher at Bow High School who accompanied 70 students to the court's "On the Road" session at Concord High School. "It's not just about cellphones. It's about driving while distracted."

Chad Belleville, 30, is serving a 3 1/2- to 7-year sentence for vehicular assault and second-degree assault. He told police he was reading a text message while driving to pick up Chinese food in December 2010 and did not realize his car had veered across two lanes and into oncoming traffic. He struck a couple's car, causing traumatic brain injury to their teenage son.

Sending a text message while driving has been against the law in New Hampshire since January 2010. It is a motor vehicle violation punishable by a $100 fine.

Reading a text while driving is not explicitly against the law in the state.

"In a case like this, where he doesn't actually send a text, there seems to be no concrete barrier on how long it takes for you to look at a phone before it's illegal and endangers someone," said Austin Mahew, a junior at Concord High School. "One second's a lot different than 10 seconds."

Belleville's lawyer argued Thursday that taking his eyes off the road for the time it took to read the message did not rise to the level of felony recklessness. A prosecutor countered that he was so engrossed in reading the text that he failed to see three cars coming at him.

The Supreme Court held the first of its "On the Road" series at St. Anselm College in 2002. It has since held court at a total of four colleges and 11 high schools, including Thursday's session in Concord, attended by students from about a half dozen schools. Barth said the series enables teachers to brief students on the issues and law behind the cases they will hear so they can be more engaged in the legal specific arguments and the legal system in general.

The students also heard arguments in a second case on whether a trial judge erred by letting a prosecutor refer to a "billy club" a person charged with assault had once owned.

After both cases, the five justices came back to the stage in office attire and spoke with students about their careers and answered questions that did not relate to cases before the court. Students asked about whether they've encountered cases that conflict with their ideals, how they prepare for oral arguments and how justices are chosen, among other topics.

Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Texting and driving: N.H. high court seeks teen input
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Family/2013/1018/Texting-and-driving-N.H.-high-court-seeks-teen-input
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe