Skip to footer

Atlanta educator faces trial in massive cheating scandal

The first of three dozen Atlanta teachers and administrators stands trial for allegedly orchestrating a massive cheating scandal involving 44 schools in 2011.

|
AP Photo/Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Kent D. Johnson
Atlanta Public Schools Area superintendent Tamara Cotman, right, talks with her lawyer Benjamin Davis in court during a hearing Thursday, May 2, 2013.
  • By Staff Associated Press

| Atlanta

The first trial is under way for an educator charged in a massive cheating scandal in Atlanta's public school system, a case that could be a preview of a bigger trial set for next year.

Testimony began Friday in the trial of former area director Tamara Cotman, the first of about three dozen former administrators and teachers to stand trial.

Witnesses could include former Gov. Sonny Perdue, who ordered a state investigation of the claims.

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported prosecutors will try to outline how cheating happened on such a broad scale, although Cotman has pleaded not guilty to influencing a witness.

The 2011 state investigation concluded cheating occurred at 44 schools so educators could avoid losing their jobs and earn bonuses.

Opening testimony showed Cotman rebuffed a teacher who reported that she had been given standardized test answer sheets, and the teacher was out of a job soon afterward.

Mary Gordon, who taught at Turner Middle School, said Cotman told her "they just do that at Turner" when asked about the answer sheets. Then Gordon's principal put her on an improvement plan, and Gordon quit out of frustration, ending a 29-year career.

Gordon testified for the prosecution to back up charges alleging Cotman harassed and demoted a principal who she believed reported to the school board that Cotman gave instructions for school employees to tell cheating scandal investigators to "go to hell."

Cotman is on trial in Fulton County Superior Court for trying to influence a witness, but she also is one of 35 former administrators and teachers, including Cotman's former boss, Superintendent Beverly Hall, who later will be tried on criminal charges for allegedly changingstudents' answers on standardized tests.

"We're going to prove to you that this defendant knew there was cheating going on and she did nothing about it," Clint Rucker, an assistant district attorney, said in his opening statement. "Those who told the truth got punished."

Cotman's attorney, Benjamin Davis, did not make an opening statement, reserving his time to do so until after the prosecution finishes presenting its case.

"I believe in my client's innocence," Davis said afterward. "We believe so far that the state hasn't proved anything, so I didn't see a need to give a statement."

Cotman is standing trial before the other defendants because her attorney requested a speedy trial on the single count of influencing a witness.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Atlanta educator faces trial in massive cheating scandal
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Family/2013/0826/Atlanta-educator-faces-trial-in-massive-cheating-scandal
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe