'Pacific Rim 2': Can it recapture the glory of the original?

'Daredevil' director Steven S. DeKnight will reportedly direct a sequel to Guillermo del Toro's 2013 movie 'Pacific Rim.' Unlike many other recent blockbusters, 'Pacific' was based on an original story.

|
Kerry Hayes/Warner Bros. Pictures/AP
'Pacific Rim' stars Charlie Hunnam (l.) and Rinko Kikuchi (r.).

A sequel to director Guillermo del Toro’s 2013 movie “Pacific Rim” is moving forward, with a director reportedly having signed on to helm the film.

Steven S. DeKnight, who has served as a director and executive producer for the Netflix series “Daredevil” and created the Starz TV program “Spartacus,” will direct the sequel to “Pacific.” 

The original “Pacific” movie was co-written by del Toro with Travis Beacham and took place on an Earth where creatures known as Kaiju are attacking various cities. Humans decide to fight them by having pilots use robots, known as Jaegers, to battle the Kaiju.

The movie received mixed reviews and did not do overwhelmingly good box office business in the US. But the film performed better abroad and that may be the reason a sequel is now moving forward.

“Pacific” seemed to be somewhat of a passion project for del Toro. “Monsters have always spoken to a part of me that is really, really essential," the director told the Associated Press upon the film’s release. "All of my life, I felt out of place. The tragedy of every monster in every movie is that they are out of place. That's the essential plight of monsters.”

The film was inspired by the Kaiji genre of Japan, which has monsters attacking and includes the “Godzilla” films. But AP writer Jake Coyle wrote of del Toro’s process on “Pacific,” “He boxed up his [Kaiju] DVDs before starting work on ‘Pacific Rim,’ intent on making a movie that wasn't a mere homage.” 

While “Pacific” owes various aspects of the movie to the Kaiju genre, the characters of the film, including Jaeger pilots Raleigh (Charlie Hunnam) and Mako (Rinko Kikuchi), are original, as is the story.

That’s something that’s somewhat of a rarity in today’s Hollywood blockbusters, which are mostly drawing inspiration from comic books, novels, and previous movies. In 2013, the year in which “Pacific” came out, the list of the top 10 highest-grossing movies of the year is dominated by projects based on previous material, with the exception of a couple of films like the space-set movie “Gravity.” 

Even when not creating a blockbuster, del Toro has gone with original stories, though that’s more common with smaller-scale films. Both last year’s Gothic tale “Crimson Peak” and and the Spanish-language World War II story “Pan’s Labyrinth” were either written or co-written by the director. 

“Pacific” co-writer Beacham told the Los Angeles Times at the time of the movie’s release that he felt new material was lacking in Hollywood.

“I grew up in the ’80s and you had these original, big-budget sci-fi adventure things all the time, not based on any source material – you’d have ‘Gremlins,’ ‘Back to the Future,’ ‘E.T.’ ‘Ghostbusters,’ the list goes on and on,” Beacham said. “I would love it so much if ‘Pacific Rim’ was but the first in a new wave of that sort of thing. I feel like as an industry, we’ve gotten too dependent on source material originated in other mediums. I’m as big of a fan of it as anyone else is…. But in addition to that sort of thing, it would be great if we had more content that was originated in the film industry itself.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Pacific Rim 2': Can it recapture the glory of the original?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Culture-Cafe/2016/0224/Pacific-Rim-2-Can-it-recapture-the-glory-of-the-original
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe