'Friends' cast reunites: How has show continued to influence TV?

Members of the cast of the TV show 'Friends' recently appeared on a TV special honoring comedy TV director James Burrows. The impact of the hugely successful NBC sitcom continues to be felt in the TV landscape.

|
Chris Haston/NBC/AP
'Friends' actors David Schwimmer (l.), Matt LeBlanc (second from l.), Jennifer Aniston (third from r.), Courteney Cox (second from r.), and Lisa Kudrow (r.) and 'Friends' director James Burrows (center) appear during the taping of 'Must See TV: An All-Star Tribute to James Burrows.'

The casts of the TV shows “Friends” and others appeared on a recent NBC special to honor TV director James Burrows, who has directed episodes of TV programs from “The Mary Tyler Moore Show” to “Mike & Molly.”

Other ensembles that appeared on the program included cast members from the shows “Cheers,” “Will and Grace,” and “Frasier.”

The special was in celebration of Burrows directing his thousandth TV episode, which he did for the NBC show “Crowded,” a program that’s set to debut March 20.

All the members of the “Friends” cast except for Matthew Perry, who is working on a stage production in England, were on the special. Perry weighed in via a taped segment.

“We would do anything for Jim Burrows,” “Friends” actress Jennifer Aniston said during the show. “He gave us the opportunity of a lifetime, and probably the best 10 years of our acting careers that we will forever remember. We experienced friendship, heartbreaks, babies, everything together. And we had a wonderful experience with the world loving us, as well. They really connected with us.” 

“Friends” became one of the most successful TV programs ever, with its 2004 finale still ranking as one of the most-watched TV events of all time. 

“Friends” was part of the Must-See TV NBC comedy block, airing alongside such programs as “Seinfeld,” “ER,” and “Will & Grace.” 

Every TV network, of course, wants to be the one with the next big success, and “Friends” was one of the biggest successes of all time in the TV industry. How is the success of the show still influencing TV today? 

Telegraph writer Jonathan Bernstein notes that “Friends” was a show without a star and seemingly without a hook for viewers.

“Unlike previous sitcom hits, ‘The Cosby Show’ and ‘Seinfeld,’ ‘Friends’ didn’t revolve around a well-known comedian,” Bernstein wrote. “Unlike Michael J Fox’s ‘Family Ties,’ it wasn’t attempting to unite the generations. Unlike ‘Cheers,’ it wasn’t a workplace comedy … The lack of a leading man or woman didn’t hurt ‘Friends.’ Rather, it made the show unique. All six actors were of equal importance. More to the point, all six actors had equal chemistry.” 

Bernstein points to programs like “Modern Family,” “New Girl,” and “The Big Bang Theory” as current programs that emphasize the group over the single star. 

“Friends” also pioneered a more relaxed template for a show, writes Gwen Ihnat of the A.V. Club.

“’Friends’ essentially created what is now known as the ‘hangout comedy,’” Ihnat writes. “The more madcap ‘Happy Endings’ also featured six leads of equal status who did little more than hang out all the time, while ‘My Boys’’ best moments were when the entire cast was playing poker ... ‘New Girl’ only hit its stride when its focus shifted from star Zooey Deschanel to more of an ensemble approach with her roommates.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Friends' cast reunites: How has show continued to influence TV?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Culture-Cafe/2016/0222/Friends-cast-reunites-How-has-show-continued-to-influence-TV
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe