Will George Miller return to direct a new 'Mad Max' movie?

Recently, Miller reportedly stated that he would not make any more 'Mad Max' movies. How common is it in Hollywood for directors to stay for multiple movies in a franchise?

|
Jasin Boland/Warner Bros. Pictures/AP
'Mad Max: Fury Road' stars Tom Hardy.

“Mad Max: Fury Road” director George Miller may not be returning for future films in the dystopian series. 

“Fury,” the newest movie in the series in 30 years, was a box office and critical smash. The movie has picked up award nominations from such groups as the Screen Actors Guild.

The movie’s director and co-writer, though, may not be coming back if there are future installments in the “Max” series. 

“I won’t make more ‘Mad Max’ movies,” Miller said, according to Page Six. “‘Fury Road’ with Charlize Theron, Zoë Kravitz, Rosie Huntington-Whiteley and Riley Keough was forever getting completed. If you finish one in a year, it’s considered a leap of faith. Start, stop, start again… Those ‘Mad Maxes’ take forever. I won’t do those anymore.” 

Even if a new “Mad Max” movie is made without Miller, though, this wouldn’t be unusual in Hollywood today. Some of the most successful franchises that have been in theaters recently have switched directors between movies.

When the movies were released in the 1970s and ‘80s, every original “Star Wars” movie had a different director (George Lucas, Irvin Kershner, and Richard Marquand took on the duties, respectively). 

Now the new and planned “Star Wars” movies seem to be using a similar method. J.J. Abrams directed the recently released smash hit “Star Wars: The Force Awakens,” and directors Rian Johnson and Colin Trevorrow are scheduled to direct the second and third films, respectively, in the new series. 

The “Mission: Impossible” movies, which have been some of the highest-grossing movies of the last several years, have switched directors every time. Most recently, Abrams, Brad Bird, and Christopher McQuarrie helmed the movies. 

The “Fast and the Furious” film series has switched directors as well, with Rob Cohen, Justin Lin, and James Wan each leading the production of a sequel. Both the "Hunger Games" and "Harry Potter" movies switched directors over their run, though they experienced less variety than, for example, the "Star Wars" series.

This is, of course, not always the case. Director Bryan Singer, for example, has directed many of the movies in the “X-Men” film series. 

There are no doubt drawbacks to this switching of directors. A new person on the job is building on what came before and attempting to create a cohesive story.

But switching directors and thus getting a fresh creative perspective and possibly different strengths has earned praise from critics in some cases. “McQuarrie doesn't change the prescription for what makes this franchise so successful, nor does he have the most practiced hand among the series' directors at milking the big action sequences for all they're worth,” Hollywood Reporter writer Todd McCarthy wrote of the newest “Mission: Impossible” movie. “But he's deepened the dramatic involvement.” 

Meanwhile, Justin Chang of Variety wrote of the film, “’Rogue Nation’ feels like the most dramatically sustained and conceptually unified picture in the series. To be sure, McQuarrie isn’t as flamboyant a stylist as his predecessors Brian De Palma and John Woo… But whatever the filmmaking may lack in visual or visceral impact, McQuarrie… more than compensates on the written front.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Will George Miller return to direct a new 'Mad Max' movie?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Culture-Cafe/2016/0113/Will-George-Miller-return-to-direct-a-new-Mad-Max-movie
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe