'Game of Thrones' finale: Was a major character really killed off?

Game of Thrones: The season finale for the HBO drama included what seemed like the death of a major 'Thrones' character. Will he return?

|
Helen Sloan/HBO/AP
'Game of Thrones' stars Sophie Turner (l.) and Aidan Gillen (r.).

The newest season finale of the HBO fantasy drama "Game of Thrones" appeared to show the departure of a major character.

(Spoilers for the “Thrones” season finale follow …) 

The episode's first surprise came when wannabe monarch Stannis Baratheon (Stephen Dillane), appeared to meet his end, finishing his doomed quest for the Iron Throne, but the death that most profoundly shocked viewers came in the last scene. Jon Snow (Kit Harington), Lord Commander of the the Night’s Watch and a character viewers had been following since the beginning of the show, was betrayed by his own men and murdered.

The question is, is Jon really dead? Fans who liked the character would of course want to believe that Jon isn’t gone for good. Harington told Entertainment Weekly, “I’ve been told I’m dead. I’m dead. I’m not coming back next season.”

But book fans know that the phrasing in “A Dance with Dragons,” George R.R. Martin’s novel in which Jon appears to meet his fate, is a bit more unclear. After “Dragons” came out, Martin asked EW, “Oh, you think he’s dead, do you? ... I’m not going to address whether he’s dead or not.”

Meanwhile, “Thrones” co-creator D.B. Weiss said in an interview with EW that it’s tough to make a TV scene difficult to interpret like one could a book scene. “In a show, everybody sees it for what it is,” Weiss said. When asked if Jon was dead, he said, “What are you gonna do? Kit’s a good looking guy. He’s very talented. He’s very sweet, and very easy to work with. It will be a sad day shooting that scene.” 

In an earlier scene, the character of Melisandre (Carice van Houten), a priestess for a god that appears to have brought back people from the dead previously, arrived at the castle Jon commanded. International Business Times writer Charles Poladian suggested that Melisandre could perhaps revive Jon.

However, if the character is really gone, either in the books and on the show or just on the show, is it fair to fans who still have unanswered questions about the character? One of the series' perhaps most important questions is Jon's parentage. Snow was raised as the illegitimate son of the otherwise virtuous Lord Eddard Stark, but his mother's identity has remained a mystery. Harington himself told EW, “The major loss with Jon’s through-line is he never finds out who his mother is and that’s the heartbreaking thing for me.”

However, a popular fan theory holds that Jon's actual parents may be Rhaegar Targaryen, the deceased son of a dead king (making him a possible nephew of aspiring Queen Daenerys, played by Emilia Clarke), and Lyanna Stark, Lord Eddard's long-dead sister. If Jon remains dead, will viewers feel cheated to have these plotlines unresolved – or resolved after his death? 

There’s no release date set for Martin’s next book, “The Winds of Winter,” so the TV show may be the first to answer the question of whether Jon is really gone. If he is, viewers will have one less virtuous character to root for.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Game of Thrones' finale: Was a major character really killed off?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Culture-Cafe/2015/0615/Game-of-Thrones-finale-Was-a-major-character-really-killed-off
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe