Tesla misses delivery deadline. Does the automaker need a course correction?

Tesla missed its vehicle delivery target for the second consecutive quarter, adding to the company's challenges as it deals with the fatal crash last week of one of its self-driving cars and a controversial bid last month to buy solar installation firm SolarCity. 

|
Reuters
The interior of a Tesla Model S is shown in autopilot mode in San Francisco.

Tesla Motors Inc. has been having a bumpy ride lately.

The electric car company missed its delivery target for the second consecutive quarter, delivering just 14,370 vehicles, according to a Tesla statement Sunday. And that's down by 450 deliveries from the first quarter.

Tesla's goal to deliver 80,000 to 90,000 vehicles in 2016 might be imperiled by these misses, adding to a list of recent woes for the company. This news comes on the heels of Tesla CEO Elon Musk's offer buy the solar installation firm SolarCity Corp., which received mixed reactions, and the announcement that federal officials were investigating a fatal crash involving a Tesla Model S that had been in a semi-autonomous mode.

In a statement, Tesla blamed the April to June quarter's dismal numbers on an "extreme production ramp" that meant almost half of the production happened in the last four weeks of the quarter, and 5,150 ordered vehicles that had yet to be shipped at the close of the quarter. The company predicted it will deliver about 50,000 vehicles in the second half of the year, a number that would bring the year total almost to 80,000, the lower end of Tesla's yearlong goal.

Tesla is poised to break new ground with its Model 3 sedan, the company's first mass-market car, which is set to go into production in late 2017, Reuters reports. The vehicle has generated excitement and 373,000 reservations have been made for the car that will start at $35,000 before tax breaks.

But that enthusiasm may be dampened by the accident that killed 40-year-old Joshua Brown, who was using Tesla's Autopilot feature on a Model S sedan. The vehicle failed to automatically activate the brakes and crashed into a tractor-trailer truck. That incident has led to an investigation of 25,000 Model S sedans by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which had previously awarded it the highest safety rating of any car it ever tested.

That hasn't been the only setback for Tesla. 

Ten years ago Mr. Musk laid out an ambitious plan for his electric car company. And, as The Wall Street Journal's Christopher Mims writes, "that has largely come true."

But Mims adds that "Mr. Musk’s ability to largely deliver on a 10-year plan inspires confidence," he also says Musk "pushes boundaries, sometimes to the breaking point."

As Musk pushes for Tesla to acquire SolarCity (as suggested in his 2006 plan), investors for both companies had a mixed response. Musk is chairman of the board for SolarCity and plans to spend as much as $2.8 billion for the photovoltaics company.

As Mims writes:

Mr. Musk clearly wants to change the world – quickly – and thinks doing so requires bucking conventions of corporate structure. That is certainly understandable, up to a point.

Along the way, though, he is inevitably involving many others. Mr. Musk should consider whether some of his ambitions have grown so outsize that they are risky not only for his companies but for the investors and customers along for the ride."

This article contains material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Tesla misses delivery deadline. Does the automaker need a course correction?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2016/0705/Tesla-misses-delivery-deadline.-Does-the-automaker-need-a-course-correction
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe