Could online counter-narratives help curb ISIS's influence?

The government is collaborating with Facebook, Twitter, and other tech firms to support online campaigns that counter extremists' recruiting efforts.

|
Evan Vucci/AP/File
An iPhone shows the Twitter and Facebook apps among others in May 2013. The Obama administration is partnering with Twitter and other tech firms to fund educational groups and others to create 'counter-messages' aimed at blunting the influence of extremist groups online.

After the San Bernardino terror attack in December, President Obama pointed to online campaigns launched by groups such as the Islamic State (IS) and called for collaboration between technology firms and law enforcement officials to “make it harder for terrorists to use technology to escape from justice.”

While discussion around unlocking an encrypted iPhone belonging to one of the San Bernardino shooters has sparked a public debate between Apple and the Justice Department, another, possibly wider-reaching aspect of the president’s efforts is taking shape.

Concerned about the effectiveness of terrorists' online recruiting efforts, the government is increasingly turning to tech firms and educational groups to launch digital campaigns that can provide “counter-narratives” aimed at blunting the online influence of extremist groups.

On Wednesday, the Justice Department met with representatives from Google, Twitter, and Facebook to discuss how the social media companies could work to disrupt the sometimes slick online campaigns employed by IS and other groups to recruit members.

Previous campaigns launched by the administration have been criticized as too reliant on graphic imagery that played on people’s fear of terrorism.

With a move away from campaigns created by the government, the goal has shifted to helping “communities and young people to amplify their own messages,” George Selim, director of the Homeland Security office that coordinates the government’s “countering violent extremism” activities, told Reuters.

Tech companies and the administration are partnering to fund “peer to peer” college courses that teach students how to create their own anti-extremist messages.

One project, unveiled at a Facebook event to showcase the counter-messaging efforts, included a video from the University of Arkansas that set graphic footage of Islamic State executions set to the song “War Pigs” by the heavy metal band Black Sabbath.

Halfway through the video, the music switched to Bob Dylan’s “The Times They Are A-Changing” as captions prompted viewers to “raise a flag” against extremism.

But one judge in the Facebook contest noted that many of the images in the video had likely been used in IS recruiting videos, and said the violent images could work against their intended effect.

“We’ve had this problem in other places where people try to instill fear in target audiences by showing all this mayhem, but it actually does the reverse with some,” noted the judge, Quintan Wiktorowicz, a former White House director for community partnerships.

Whether such counter-messaging efforts can be effective in the long term also remains to be seen.

A Facebook-based study of online campaigns in four European countries, conducted by the British research group Demos, struggled to analyze the effects of online campaigns.

It was “extremely difficult to calculate with any degree of precision,” whether counter-message campaigns have a definite impact on the longer-term attitudes or offline behavior of people who see them, it concluded.

Facebook has also sponsored efforts to create counter-messaging by offering students limited budgets and $200 in ad credits from the site, the Wall Street Journal reports.

Other educational groups have taken a different approach. WORDE, a Muslim educational organization, launched a campaign last week to counter IS messages with its own catchy videos and live broadcasts that discuss mainstream Islam. The group hopes to measure the impact of the campaign through software or survey questions.

“Everybody creates stuff but doesn't really care about whether it's connected to the science of evaluations,” Hedieh Mirahmadi, the group’s president, told Reuters.

The meeting to discuss the government's effort to counter extremism, dubbed “Madison Valleywood” in an apparent portmanteau of common nicknames for advertising, technology, and the movie industry, included invitations to 50 tech companies, CNN reports.

Apple attended, despite its widely publicized conflict with the Justice Department over unlocking the phone of Syed Rizwan Farook, one of the San Bernardino shooters. 

Government officials at the meeting reportedly praised the efforts by social sites such as Twitter and Facebook to block and take down accounts linked to extremist groups

Nick Rasmussen, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, told meeting participants, “We've seen more aggressive takedowns across social media platforms, which is a really good thing," an industry source told CNN.

Civil liberties groups have debated how the sites decide to take down content, particularly noting the vague language around what content can be removed.

Material from Reuters was used in this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Could online counter-narratives help curb ISIS's influence?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2016/0225/Could-online-counter-narratives-help-curb-ISIS-s-influence
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe