Facebook's new reactions are nearly ready. Will users 'like' them?

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg says the company is nearly ready to roll out a new system for responding to users' posts with a single click.

|
Paul Sakuma/AP/File
A sign with Facebook's "Like" logo is posted at Facebook headquarters near the office for the company's User Operations Safety Team in Menlo Park, Calif., Dec. 13, 2011. After four months of testing outside the United States, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said on Wednesday that 'pretty soon' multiple new emotions will be added to the social network throughout the world.

Facebook has plans to scrap the now iconic and simple “like” button in place of a more emotion-driven system. And the change could be coming soon.

Facebook engineers have been working on a new reaction system that will augment the “like” system currently in place. The system will offer users the choice of six different reactions to show how they feel about a post: “love,” “haha,” “wow,” “sad,” “angry,” and the classic “like." 

The change is designed to give users more options and to fix many of the limitations imposed by the simplified “Like” feature. If a Facebook user sees a post on their newsfeed about a tragedy or natural disaster, the current system becomes an issue – do users “Like” the post to show acknowledgement or do they abstain so as not to “like” bad news?

The new reaction system has the potential to give users alternatives, but how they will react to the change is still unknown: “wow,” “sad,” or “angry?”

“People don’t like to make many decisions” on social media, Grace Abbot, a media and digital strategist with B/C Designers, tells The Christian Science Monitor. “I’m sure there will be people who take advantage of the feature, but for the most part ... its too much." 

Ms. Abbot says she sees people using the “Like” feature more as an indication of acknowledgement or to support a post than actually expressing an emotional response.

Facebook’s mixed history with website changes also points to the potential for a lukewarm acceptance of the reaction system from users.

Facebook as a website has undergone several reiterations since its 2004 launch from founder Mark Zuckerberg’s dorm room. But since 2011 and the addition of the “Timeline” feature, the website’s changes have been primarily aesthetic. Facebook’s growth as a company has been tied primarily to acquisitions, like Whatsapp and Instagram, or side projects like the Messenger app

When Facebook’s website has undergone change, its been met with resistance from avid users. In 2009, Facebook’s change to the homepage was met with a Facebook group called “Change Facebook Back to Normal,” which garnered a little more than a million users, according to The Telegraph. The pressure has resulted in many potential changes to the website being scrapped before reaching an audience, including Facebook Chief Product Officer Chris Cox’s past project to revamp the News Feed.

“I think any good company is trying things, is forcing itself to try things, and you need to be able to put things out there and try to learn,” Mr. Cox told Bloomberg in reference to past mistakes. “People only get in trouble if they’re not honest about failure.”

The reaction system has been tested in Spain, Ireland, Chile, the Philippines, Portugal, and Colombia. According to Wired, the new reactions will launch "in the next few weeks."

“This was a feature that was right in the heart of the way you use Facebook, so it needed to be executed really well in order to not detract and clutter up the experience,” Cox told Bloomberg.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Facebook's new reactions are nearly ready. Will users 'like' them?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2016/0128/Facebook-s-new-reactions-are-nearly-ready.-Will-users-like-them
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe