Google Earth data suggests Russia shelled Ukraine, say researchers

A report from a Britain-based investigative reporting group used satellite imagery to determine if artillery strikes in Ukraine came from launch sites inside Russian territory.

|
Baz Ratner/Reuters
A fighter with separatist self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic army stands on the roof of a building damaged by fighting in the village of Nikishine, south east of Debaltseve on Tuesday. Pro-Russian rebels and government forces fought street-to-street in a strategic town in east Ukraine on Tuesday and refused to pull back their heavy guns, all but scuppering hopes that a European-brokered peace deal will end months of conflict. Military trucks and tanks came and went in the largely destroyed village of Nikishine as the rebels pounded nearby Debaltseve with rockets, heavy artillery and mortar bombs.

A new report suggests that Russia shelled Ukrainian towns from inside Russian territory.

The British-based investigative reporting group the Bellingcat Team, says that its research into a series of artillery strikes during the summer of 2014 implicate the Russian military with firing artillery rounds into Ukraine.

Bellingcat used publicly available satellite imagery from Google Earth to look at reported artillery strikes from between July 9 and September 5 of last year. During this period, the Ukrainian military lost control of swaths of its border territory.

The first battle in question occurred near the town of Amvrosiivka on July 14, where Ukrainian forces reported 330 artillery strikes, according to the Bellingcat Report. The other two battles observed took place on July 14 and July 16.

Part of the evidence Bellingcat discovered were a series of burn marks on the earth that would indicate multiple rocket launchers had been installed just inside Russian territory near the village of Seleznev, some nine miles away, from the same day’s images that featured the first strike from July 14. In the satellite images taken before the attacks, there were no such burn marks at the alleged launch sites, according to the report.

The location of the burn marks matches the trajectory of the artillery rounds the Bellingcat Team had determined using established military calculations that involve evaluating the type of crater the armament leaves, according to the report. The Bellingcat Team analyzed two different types of craters. One kind, they say, is caused by low-angle rounds that cause a diagonal spray of the earth from the center upon impact. The other kind is caused by a high angle impact, which leaves a triangular shaped crater. From these craters, the investigators concluded that the artillery fire had come from a south-south west trajectory, pointing them to the alleged firing position.

The Russian government has maintained for the entirety of the conflict that its military forces have not participated in any of the fighting. But this latest revelation seems to make the strongest case so far of Russian involvement, reports the Guardian. In August 2014, the Guardian reported that a column of Russian-plated armored personnel carriers had crossed the border into Ukraine. 

The next battle analyzed by Bellingcat took place in the Ukrainian region of Chervonopartyzansk. There, Ukrainian forces came under a heavy artillery barrage between July 14 and August 8, and when the team applied the same method to the more than 800 craters, they discovered five separate possible firing positions. Four of them were on Russian soil. Scorched earth was observed at these possible sites, as well as tire tracks, another possible sign of mobile artillery.

Using satellite imagery for calculating artillery trajectory based on crater depth is an imperfect science at best, and this alone would not be enough to prove Russian involvement. But the visible evidence of burned farmland that match with the calculations that place the rocket launchers inside Russian territory make for a compelling case, notes the Guardian.

Stephen Johnson, a weapons expert at the Cranfield Forensic Institute at the Defense Academy of the United Kingdom told the Guardian, calculating artillery trajectory using only satellite imagery is, “highly experimental and prone to inaccuracy.”

“This does not mean there is no value to the method, but that any results must be considered with caution and require corroboration,” Mr. Johnson told the Guardian. He also added that the most significant part of the report was the discovery of the purported firing positions.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Google Earth data suggests Russia shelled Ukraine, say researchers
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2015/0217/Google-Earth-data-suggests-Russia-shelled-Ukraine-say-researchers
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe