Water didn't carve Mars' gullies. What did?

Scientists examined high resolution images of 100 sites on the red planet in an effort to understand what processes carved Mars' gullies. 

|
NASA/JPL-Caltech/Univ. of Arizona/REUTERS/File
Portions of the Martian surface shot by NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter show many channels from 1 meter to 10 meters wide on a scarp in the Hellas impact basin, in this photograph taken in 2011.

Mars and its atmosphere may have had a strikingly Earthlike past in some ways, but NASA announced Friday that unlike Earth, some of Mars’ geological features are not formed by flowing water.

Scientists have long been aware of the presence of gullies on Mars. On Earth, similar looking gullies would have been carved by rainwater runoff, and for some time, scientists theorized that they could indeed have been created by liquid water. Recent tests, however, indicate that liquid water is not responsible for Mars’ gullies. But what is?

“Mars is not a cookie-cutter planet of water or no water,” lead author Jorge Nuñez, a planetary scientist at Johns Hopkins, told the Los Angeles Times, “and it just goes on to show the complexity that there is on Mars. And obviously there’s still a lot that we don’t understand – yet.”

Researchers used the Mars Orbiter's Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer for Mars (CRISM), as well as its High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment, to examine high resolution images of 100 sites on Mars.

There was no evidence in the photos for the presence of liquid water or its byproducts, according to NASA. And when scientists did see things, including clays, that would indicate the presence of liquid water, they provided evidence for a past Mars with liquid water on its surface, rather than at present.

“On Earth and on Mars, we know that the presence of phyllosilicates – clays – or other hydrated minerals indicates formation in liquid water," Dr. Núñez said in a NASA press release. "When we did see them, they were erosional debris from ancient rocks, exposed and transported downslope, rather than altered in more recent flowing water. These gullies are carving into the terrain and exposing clays that likely formed billions of years ago when liquid water was more stable on the Martian surface."

Scientists have since turned to other possible explanations for the presence of Mars’ gullies, which are common particularly in areas near the planet’s poles. One other primary suspect in the mystery of the gullies is the freezing and thawing of carbon dioxide frost.

Researchers who support the carbon dioxide frost theory have created computer modeling to support their idea. This latest study provides even more evidence that they may be right, by eliminating the possibility that liquid water carved the gullies.

So is there water on Mars? Certainly not in the form that we experience it on Earth, where flowing water is abundant enough to carve gullies and shape geological features. Yet, there is still evidence that water existed on Mars at one point.

Not only do the presence of ancient clays indicate that there was likely liquid water on the red planet at some point, another of Mars’ geological features, recurring slope lineae (RSL), also give evidence for water in some form. These RSL are dark stripes that change depending on the seasons, and could be caused by very salty water, as evidenced by the presence of hydrated salt.

This latest study was published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Water didn't carve Mars' gullies. What did?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0730/Water-didn-t-carve-Mars-gullies.-What-did
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe