Astronomers befuddled by mysterious flickering star

After a star's strange flickering and dimming behavior was recently observed, scientists have been trying to explain it. They are still looking for a feasible explanation. 

|
NASA/JPL-Caltech
This illustration shows a star behind a shattered comet.

An erratic star in the Cygnus constellation that’s been dimming and flickering in an unusual pattern has baffled scientists. In recent months, they have tried and tried to explain the unusual light behavior of KIC 8462852, from proposing that something is orbiting the star and thereby blocking its light as it passes in front of it, to suggesting that the flickers might be laser signals from aliens.

So far, none of the explanations are holding up to scientific scrutiny.

It doesn’t appear that the dimming is caused by a huge, orbiting array of solar panels, built by an alien civilization with an immense industrial capacity. Nor does the flickering seem to be coming from aliens who are trying to communicate with us, according to the SETI Institute in Mountain View, Calif., which looks for extraterrestrial life.

This fall, the Institute unleashed an array of telescopes on this distant star, about 1,400 light years away, to look for radio signals and laser pulses to try to explain the occasional 20 percent dimming of the light we see from the star.

It found nothing, and warned against succumbing to the temptation to rely on alien life to rationalize the inexplicable.

“Hundreds of years of astronomical study has taught us something important: Every time we've turned our telescopes to the heavens and found mysterious phenomena, there were folks who immediately assumed we had uncovered evidence of cosmic companions,” says Seth Shostak, senior astronomer at SETI, in a statement. “But each time, the truth turned out to be less exotic: we had discovered some previously unknown natural phenomenon."

In this case, scientists haven’t yet discovered a natural explanation.

The hypothesis that this bizarre dimming behavior is caused by a cloud of gas and dust that envelops young stars doesn’t hold up, as this one is too old for that.

It also has been suggested that planets or a cluster of comets block out some of the light when they travel in front of the star, affectionately called “Tabby’s Star” in honor of Yale University astronomer Tabetha Boyajian, whose team published a paper in October describing the star’s unusual light pattern.

Dr. Boyajian’s team was among those who proposed the comet cluster as a feasible explanation.

But the hypothesis has been challenged by a Louisiana State University astrophysicist Bradley Schaefer. He studied 1,200 images of Tabby’s Star taken over a century starting in 1890 by the Harvard College Observatory to discover that this star, which is about 50 percent larger than Earth's sun, has been dimming over time.

So for the comets hypothesis to hold up, as the New Scientist recently reported, there would need to be 648,000 huge comets passing in front of Tabby’s Star constantly over a century. This is an unlikely scenario, Dr. Schaefer told the New Scientist.

“The comet-family idea was reasonably put forth as the best of the proposals, even while acknowledging that they all were a poor lot,” Schaefer told New Scientist. “But now we have a refutation of the idea, and indeed, of all published ideas."

It also has been deemed unlikely that the star's bizarre behavior is the result of planets orbiting the star and occasionally blocking its light. Even Jupiter-size worlds – more than 1,000 times bigger than Earth – would only block about 1 percent of the star's light, as SETI points out.

So what gives?

Science has yet to find out, so stay tuned. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Astronomers befuddled by mysterious flickering star
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0119/Astronomers-befuddled-by-mysterious-flickering-star
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe