How that historic flyby of Pluto almost didn't happen

NASA scientists and engineers worked around the clock to launch the New Horizons spacecraft in time for it to intercept Pluto.

|
Fly Over Pluto's Hillary Mountains and Sputnik Plain | Video
Pluto's "heart" and other surface details are visible in this stunning false-color view of the dwarf planet, which was captured by NASA's New Horizons spacecraft on July 14, 2015.

NASA's New Horizons spacecraft got the first-ever up-close looks at Pluto this month, but the epic encounter very easily could have been delayed by a couple of years.

Scientists and engineers had to work at breakneck speed to get New Horizons launched during a brief window in January 2006, said mission principal investigator Alan Stern, of the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado.

Missing this three-week window — which enabled a speed-boosting flyby of Jupiter in 2007 — by even a few days would have pushed the July 14 Pluto close approach into 2016, Stern said. [New Horizons' Pluto Flyby: Complete Coverage]

But the team's hard work paid off, and New Horizons zoomed past Pluto on time.

"We did it," Stern said here Sunday (July 26) at the Intrepid Sea, Air and Space Museum, during a talk at the fourth annual Space and Science Festival. "We worked nights and weekends for four years."

During the talk, he gave the audience some insights into the history of New Horizons, and what makes the mission special.

 New Horizons was one of several Pluto missions that scientists proposed and developed beginning in the 1990s, Stern said. At the time, researchers were beginning to learn that Pluto was not some lone, icy oddball, but just one of many objects orbiting in the distant Kuiper Belt, which lies beyond Neptune. That realization made the scientific case for a Pluto mission stronger, Stern said.

"In the 1990s, we discovered Pluto's context — the third zone of the solar system," he said.

With a total cost of $723 million, New Horizons is much cheaper than the Voyager program, NASA's last effort to explore the solar system's outer reaches. (The Voyager 2 probe made history's first flyby of Neptune in 1989.)

The New Horizons team managed to keep costs down because new technologies allowed for miniaturization and more efficient data processing, Stern said. The spacecraft itself is small, weighing in at about 1,036 pounds (470 kilograms) when loaded with fuel. It had to be small in order to get as much speed as possible from the Atlas V rocket it launched on, Stern said.

"We basically put up an Atlas V empty," he said.

New Horizons was the fastest spacecraft ever launched. It passed the moon in 9 hours, going about  eight times faster than NASA's crewed Apollo missions. [Photos: NASA's Apollo Moon Missions]

We made it to Jupiter in 13 months flat," Stern said. Records were set once again in getting to the orbits of Saturn, Uranus and Neptune.

While the main purpose of the Jupiter flyby was to give New Horizons a speed boost, the encounter also provided an opportunity to check out the probe's instrument package. New Horizons caught a stunning shot of Jupiter's moon Io silhouetted against the giant planet, and the instruments were all found to be in good shape. 

Responding to an audience member's question, Stern noted that New Horizons has had to be very autonomous, more so than many other spacecraft, because of the time lag of the signal. (New Horizons is about 3 billion miles, or 4.8 billion kilometers, from Earth at the moment, so it takes commands about 4.5 hours to reach the spacecraft.)

"You can't remote-control this puppy," Stern said.

New Horizons' observations have revealed that Pluto is a geologically active world with glaciers, mountains of water ice covered with nitrogen frost and hydrocarbons such as acetylene on the surface ("Don't light a match," Stern quipped).

The planet likely also has a liquid water mantle. A member of the audience asked if that might make the planet an abode for life.

"Ask me in a year," Stern said. (That's how long it will take, more or less, for all of the data to come back from the probe.) "We have 15 watts [of transmission power] and 3 billion miles."

The liquid water mantle is still a hypothesis, but the evidence for it comes from several directions. First, the bulk density of Pluto indicates the dwarf planet must have a certain percentage of rock given its size; the rest of its mass is made up of ice. Furthermore, at Pluto's frigid temperatures, the weight of the ice in Pluto's crust would cause the water ice underneath it — as well as any nitrogen — to liquefy.

Another piece of evidence that there's water under the crust is the fact that the mountains of Pluto are made of water ice. "Nitrogen is a weak material," Stern said. "So it's pretty clear that the mountains have to be water ice. It's pretty strong, as you know from ice cubes."

New Horizons will make a flyby of a second Kuiper Belt object in 2019, if NASA approves and funds a proposed extended mission. Sometime in the decade or so after that, the spacecraft's plutonium power source will run down.

With all that New Horizons has discovered, and could still potentially discover in the future, one person asked what Stern's favorite part of the mission was.

"Getting to Pluto," he said. 

Follow us @SpacedotcomFacebook or Google+. Originally published on Space.com.

Copyright 2015 SPACE.com, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Follow CSMonitor's board Astronomy on Pinterest.
You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to How that historic flyby of Pluto almost didn't happen
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2015/0730/How-that-historic-flyby-of-Pluto-almost-didn-t-happen
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe