Why climate change may mean longer airline flights

Scientists, studying global climate models, find changing wind patterns may impact flight lengths and carbon dioxide emissions. 

|
Eric Kayne/AP/Houston Chronicle
In this Nov. 4, 2012 file photo, a Boeing 787 takes off from George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston.

If you fly, particularly between Hawaii and Seattle, new research has discovered that your flight times may increase, albeit only slightly, because of global changes in wind patterns. This increase could cost the airline industry over $3 billion annually, scientists estimate.

The airline industry “closely monitors the midlatitude jet stream for flight paths and arrival times,” not only to ensure flights take the most expedient route, but also because the length of time a plane spends in the air is positively correlated with costs for the airline, largely because of jet fuel prices, according to the study published this week in the scientific journal Nature by researchers at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts. 

This project brought together 20 climate modeling groups from around the world. In this meeting, 34 separate climate models were created, and half of them predicted that a change in the annual mean 300-mb zonal wind field would occur. This is the same northeastern subtropical corridor between Hawaii and Seattle.

The typical commercial airliner burns through a gallon of fuel a second, according to the research presented. That means every second a commercial Boeing plane is in the air, it costs the airline upwards of $3 (prices for jet fuel in San Francisco range from $3.59-7.41 as of July, 2015).

While an extra $3 per second might not seem like much for a major carrier to pay, the cumulative effect of this change can have an impact on the airline industry. The authors of the study calculated that for a twice-daily round trip flight over three routes in the North Pacific sector made by four carriers would amount to total of 133 added flying hours annually. This change would lead to an added usage of 480,000 additional gallons of fuel which combined would emit over 4.6 million kilograms of carbon dioxide per year into the atmosphere.

The current length of a one-way flight from San Francisco to Hawaii ranges from four hours and 40 minutes to five hours. Thus, with a 20 minute range in flight times already, any changes in the flight time, resulting from wind patterns, are unlikely to be noticed by the average traveler.

But, for every extra 30 seconds spent in the air, an airline will pay about an additional $90-150 per flight, depending on the price of jet fuel at the time.

Kristopher B. Karnauskas, who led the team, found that if the estimated changes in the zonal wind field over the North Pacific sector applied to all flights made by all commercial airlines, roughly one billion extra hours would be spent in total flying time, leading to an estimated cost to the airline of over $3 billion. Additionally, if this cumulative residual time is applied to carbon dioxide emissions, over 10,000 million additional kilograms of greenhouse gases could be added to the atmosphere, a number that would amount to 1.5 percent of the total carbon dioxide emissions by the global commercial airline industry.  

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why climate change may mean longer airline flights
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2015/0716/Why-climate-change-may-mean-longer-airline-flights
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe