SpaceX successfully ejects crew capsule: Did space flight just get safer?

Space Exploration Technologies Corp. took a significant step toward establishing a way for astronauts to escape if something goes wrong during ascent.

|
Red Huber/Orlando Sentinel/AP
SpaceX's Dragon crew capsule parachutes deploy Wednesday after a test in Cape Canaveral, Fla. SpaceX fired the mock-up capsule to test the new launch escape system for astronauts.

In a test lasting just under 100 seconds, Space Exploration Technologies Corp. appears to have demonstrated that its crew capsule – one of two NASA is banking on to carry American astronauts to and from the International Space Station – can vault clear of danger on a launch pad.

The company plans to return the capsule to its facility in Texas for a thorough analysis of the results, but each stage of the brief flight appeared to go as planned.

The next step, coming later this year, is a test of the capsule's ability to kick free of a rocket during the most stressful part of its ascent.

NASA's goal is to have two companies, SpaceX and The Boeing Company, ready to ferry astronauts in 2017. The move would end the United States' dependence on Russia for astronaut transportation, reliance that came with the end of the space shuttle program in 2011.

In many ways, the SpaceX test is a legacy of the space-shuttle program, too. The lesson learned from the shuttle era came at the ultimate cost, the loss of the space shuttle Challenger and its seven-member crew shortly after launch in 1986.

NASA thought it could design a spaceship that didn't need a system for protecting astronauts from catastrophic events that could occur during this critical phase of a mission, notes Jon Cowart, NASA's liaison with SpaceX on the company's commercial-crew effort.

"As physics and nature will sometimes do, they taught us a lesson that maybe you should not go do that," he said during a pre-test briefing.

Wednesday's test, from a launch pad at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station on Florida's east coast, involved a Dragon capsule with eight engines built into its sides. The capsule was perched atop a cargo "trunk" the capsule carries with it. It was laden with instruments to measure vibration, noise levels, G-forces, and a range of other traits that would affect astronauts inside. It also carried an instrumented test dummy to serve as a stand-in for an astronaut.

For six seconds, the engine vaulted the capsule and trunk off the pad and out toward the Atlantic Ocean. By the time the engine shut off, the capsule was moving at between 330 and 400 miles an hour.

At the highest point in the capsule's trajectory, the trunk separated, and a short time later the capsule's two-step parachute system deployed, lowering the capsule into the water about 1 minutes and 38 seconds after launch.

This was the first time SpaceX had tested the system with all eight of the capsule's engines operating. Unlike the escape engine NASA mounted on the noses of the Mercury and Apollo capsules, which had to be jettisoned during ascent, Dragons engines can be used throughout an ascent and into orbit. Eventually, the company hopes to use the engine for landing crews near their launch sites.

Today's test focused on moving astronauts clear of any impending catastrophe on the launch pad. This summer, SpaceX is planning an in-flight abort test, to be launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.

It's a more demanding test because the capsule will try to flee a rocket in the face of an enormous build-up of air pressure ahead of the craft as it ascends. That pressure depends on the speed of the rocket and the density of the atmosphere. The atmosphere grows less dense with increasing height. But a rocket moves through that increasingly thin air at rapidly increasing speeds.

At roughly eight miles up, a rocket's speed and the air's density conspire to present the greatest amount of air pressure the rocket will encounter as it rises through the atmosphere. Not only does an escape system have to overcome that pressure. It also has to overcome turbulence that would try to suck an escaping capsule back toward the rocket, Mr. Cowart explained.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to SpaceX successfully ejects crew capsule: Did space flight just get safer?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2015/0506/SpaceX-successfully-ejects-crew-capsule-Did-space-flight-just-get-safer
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe