How to measure 2014 biggest ‘supermoon’: diopter, theodolite, or just eye it?

Can casual astral observers really tell that the so-called ‘supermoon’ – the space rock’s closest perigee to earthlings – looks bigger than, say, a harvest moon? Verdict’s still out.

|
J. David Ake/AP/File
Traffic streaks by the supermoon as it rises behind the Memorial Bridge in Washington on July 12, 2014. The full moon may seem huge, but it's just an illusion caused by its position in the sky.

Everybody’s all excited about Sunday’s big supermoon 2014, but can a casual observer really tell if the moon seems larger – or if they’re just looking at regular old “moon illusion,” or the magnifying impact of atmosphere and fixed objects when the moon first peeks above the horizon?

Greek astronomers used angle measuring tools like the diopter, which Euclid among others used to good effect, while subsequent researchers migrated to the diopter’s evolutionary offspring, the theodolite – or surveying scope – to inspect the moon and stars.

Both instruments work well for measuring angles against fixed object to ascertain distance, which is how astronomers first understood that the moon’s orbit is elliptical, and that it passes closer to the earth on some days than others. When that perigee occurs when no earth shadow falls on the moon, voila, the supermoon, also less often called the perigean moon.

But without a diopter, can the human eye actually tell whether Sunday’s moon over, say, Miami Beach is larger than an average one? Perhaps, perhaps not.

Sure, on paper, the supermoon is about 8 percent bigger and up to 30 percent brighter than a normal full moon.

Still, a supermoon doesn’t “look noticeably bigger or brighter than average, unless you measure it pretty carefully,” writes Maria Temming on SkyAndTelescope.com. “The Moon’s orbit is only a little bit elliptical.”

NASA astronomer Tony Phillips writes in a recent blog post that telling the difference is “tricky.” He adds, “There are no rulers floating in the sky to measure lunar diameters. Hanging high overhead with no reference points to provide a sense of scale, one full moon can seem much like any other.”

But one amateur astronomer-blogger has claimed for several years that the perigee can actually be observed with the naked eye.

German space blogger Daniel Fischer writes that, in February 2011, he had no knowledge of a special full moon when he looked up in the sky and, as he writes, “noted its unusual angular size, that is, its size as it appears on the dome of Earth’s sky.” After checking an ephemeris, or moon table, he writes: “[T]he reason was obvious: perigee was close and the moon’s distance only 223,000 miles! That’s compared to the moon’s average distance of 239,000 miles.

“And so I had found out by chance that the ellipticity, or oblong-ness, of the lunar orbit is actually pretty obvious to the unaided eye, with perigee full moons easily recognized as such without being told about their closeness beforehand.”

Okay, so there’s the rub: The supermoon is most obvious when a viewer inadvertently stumbles on one with no foreknowledge. Unfortunately, there’s no chance of that with this Sunday’s supermoon, at least for anyone reading this.

Either way, 2014 has provided a bounty of opportunities to personally assess the moon’s stellar girth. The year has five supermoons. The most recent one was in July, the next one will come in September. But Sunday’s moon, a diopter would indicate, will skim the closest to Earth.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to How to measure 2014 biggest ‘supermoon’: diopter, theodolite, or just eye it?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2014/0809/How-to-measure-2014-biggest-supermoon-diopter-theodolite-or-just-eye-it
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe