Tara Reid says a sharknado could really happen. Is she right?

Actress and model Tara Reid chatted with GQ magazine about the likelihood of a sharknado, a hypothetical meteorological phenomenon in which a cyclone draws sharks from the water and deposits them, alive and thrashing, on top of an unsuspecting urban populace.

|
AP
A scene from 'Sharknado 2: The Second One," shows marine predators falling out of the sky.

"Sharknado," the 2013 made-for-TV film about a twister that lifts sharks out of the ocean and drops them, alive and hungry, into downtown Los Angeles, will soon have a sequel. And according to one of the film's heroines, the plot of "Sharknado 2: The Second One," is not entirely implausible. 

"You know, it actually can happen," actress and model Tara Reid said to GQ magazine.

"Which is crazy," she added. "Not that it—the chances of it are, like, you know, it's like probably ‘pigs could fly.' Like, I don't think pigs could fly, but actually sharks could be stuck in tornados. There could be a sharknado."

Is she correct? Could a waterspout lift up a great white shark and transport it from sea to land? And how long would it survive?

If it ever did happen, sharks would not be the first aquatic creatures to unexpectedly become airborne. As recently as 2010, residents of an interior Australian desert town reported hundreds of fish hurdling out of the sky. A tornado most likely swept up the fish and water, only to deposit them hundreds of miles inland, according to the Australian Bureau of Meteorology. Throughout history, there have been reports of frogs, jellies, crayfish, and even baby alligators raining from the sky.  

But sharks? "There are records of small fish being picked up by waterspouts, but sharks are pretty big and that makes it a lot harder" Harold Brooks, a scientist at NOAA's National Severe Storms Laboratory, told Mother Jones magazine in 2013. 

If a tornado were powerful enough to carry a shark, the resulting rotating debris of wood and metal would kill the animal, Dr. Brooks added.

At least in theory, a tornado could generate winds strong enough to keep a shark aloft. Kim Martini, a physical oceanographer at the University of Washington in Seattle, calculates that one would need a minimum vertical wind speed of 127 miles per hour to fly a 2,200-lb. shark. Wind speeds like that are rare, but not unheard of in the most powerful twisters.

"Carry a diversionary herring just in case," Dr. Martini writes.

A tornado might be able to keep a shark in flight, but could a violently rotating column of wind pluck the animal out of the water in the first place? 

Probably not. Sharks, like most sensible animals, try to avoid intense storms. During one Florida twister that struck the Ft. Lauderdale theme park Ocean World in 1969, the park's head said that the captive sharks “head[ed] for the bottom of their shallow pool when the winds began to build,” according to an Associated Press article from 1969.

Even if a sharknado were to succeed in capturing a shark, it is unlikely that the shark would take out its misfortune on humans, as unprovoked shark attacks rarely hurt or maim people.

So in the end, is Ms. Reid right? Under certain conditions, a twister could fling a shark carcass some distance, possibly on top of a swimsuit-clad, chainsaw-wielding beachgoer. But it's probably safe to say that it wouldn't happen twice. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Tara Reid says a sharknado could really happen. Is she right?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2014/0728/Tara-Reid-says-a-sharknado-could-really-happen.-Is-she-right
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe