Kepler epitaph? Eight most intriguing finds of troubled telescope.

Kepler, the space telescope designed to help us find other Earth-like planets, is on the fritz. Scientists hope they will be able to fix it remotely, but if they can't, its brief, brilliant career could be over. Here are eight of its most important discoveries.

5. Kepler-20e: Smaller than us

JPL-Caltech/Ames/NASA/File
This chart compares the first Earth-size planets found around a sun-like star to planets in our own solar system, Earth and Venus. NASA's Kepler mission discovered the newfound planets, called Kepler-20e and Kepler-20f.

In planet-hunting, "Earth-size" has been a relative term. Given that larger planets are easier to detect, anything in the "Earth-size" ballpark has been celebrated. With the discovery of Kepler-20e and 20f, however, scientists bagged their first actual Earth-size planet-candidates.

In fact, in Kepler-20e, they for the first time found an exoplanet smaller than Earth – 0.87 times its size, to be exact. And at 1.03 times Earth's size, Kepler-20f is almost a precise match.

Both are thought to be rocky, though neither is thought to have an atmosphere, as both are closer to their star than Mercury is to the sun. Kepler 20e orbits at a distance of 4.7 million miles, completing a revolution every 6.1 days. Kepler 20f orbits at 10.3 million miles, taking 19.6 days to complete one circuit. Mercury orbits our sun at a distance of 35 million miles and its year lasts 88 Earth days.

Like the Kepler-11 system, the Kepler-20 system also challenges current models of solar-system formation. Particularly puzzling is the fact that three larger, Neptune-size gas planets are interspersed among the two rocky planets in an alternating order: gas / rocky (20e) / gas / rocky (20f) / gas.

"The architecture of that solar system is crazy," science team member David Charbonneau of Harvard University said during a teleconference announcing the finding in December 2011. "This is the first time that we've seen anything like this."

5 of 8

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.