Elevated CO2 robs crops of nutrients, say scientists

Thanks to rising carbon dioxide levels, wheat, rice, and soybeans could have lower levels of zinc and iron in the future, according to new research.

|
Reuters
A worker picks out bad beans from a pile of soybeans at a supermarket in Wuhan, Hubei province, in April.

Key crops eaten by a large portion of the world’s population have lower levels of zinc and iron when grown at the elevated carbon dioxide levels that scientists predict will occur by the middle of the century, according to a new study.

The research, detailed in this week’s issue of the journal Nature, found that wheat, rice and soybeans grown in high carbon dioxide conditions have lower levels of these important nutrients. The finding has major global health implications, as nearly 2 billion people around the world receive 70 percent or more of their dietary zinc and iron from these types of crops.

“Zinc deficiency can cause child mortality from infectious diseases because the immune system is not functioning properly, and iron deficiency can cause maternal mortality and reductions in IQ and work productivity, and increased mortality from infectious diseases,” said the study's first author Samuel Myers, a researcher at the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston.

Howard Frumkin, dean and professor of environmental and occupational health sciences at the University of Washington, in Seattle, said the new study provides the strongest evidence to date that climate change could threaten the nutritional value of foods with respect to zinc and iron.

“One of the cardinal features of climate change is higher carbon dioxide levels,” said Frumkin, who was not involved in the study. “This is exactly the kind of science we need to do to understand how to anticipate impacts of climate change on nutrition and how to protect people.”

Previous research has found evidence that elevated carbon dioxide levels can lead to lower agricultural yields and reduce the protein content of food crops, Frumkin added, and the finding now that zinc and iron are also affected raises the possibility that a host of other “micronutrients” such as iodine, selenium, and individual amino acids could also be impacted. “It’s a new area of research opening up now,” he said.

FACE experiments

Prior studies of crops grown in greenhouses and chambers with elevated carbon dioxide found nutrient reductions, but those studies drew criticisms for using artificial growing conditions.

In contrast, Myers and his team compiled results from experiments that used a free-air carbon dioxide enrichment – FACE – technology, which allows plants to be grown in open fields at elevated carbon dioxide levels. The technology consists of a ring of jets surrounding the crops, which maintains a certain level of carbon dioxide by tracking wind-direction and carbon dioxide concentration.

Myers’ group included crop scientists around the world who were conducting FACE experiments on 41 different genetic strains, or “cultivars,” of grains and legumes over three continents. “Our database was more than 10 times larger than all the previously published FACE data on nutrients in food crops combined,” Myers said.

The carbon dioxide levels in all of the included FACE experiments were around 550 parts per million, which is the projected atmospheric carbon dioxide level around the year 2050. For comparison, the carbon dioxide concentration at the start of the Industrial Revolution in the 18th century was 280 ppm, and April 2014 was the first time that global carbon dioxide levels climbed above 400 ppm for an entire month.

When the team analyzed their data, the results showed a significant decrease in the concentrations of zinc and iron as well as protein in wheat and rice cultivars. For example, zinc, iron, and protein concentrations in wheat grains grown at the FACE sites were reduced by about 9 percent, 5 percent, and 6 percent respectively, compared with wheat grown at ambient carbon dioxide. If people consumed more food to make up for the drop in nutrients there could be other health consequences, including increased obesity, Myers posited. “The ratio of nutrients to calories in the food is really important.”

Zinc and iron were also significantly reduced in legumes such as soybeans and field peas in the study, although protein was not.

Countermeasures

The authors suggest that some of the nutritional deficits they observed could be counteracted through breeding programs that select for decreased sensitivity to carbon dioxide. For example, their results showed that zinc and iron varied substantially across different rice strains.

David Wolfe, a plant and soil ecologist at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, said that in addition to reducing carbon dioxide admissions, other strategies include breeding for crops that take up more iron and zinc from the soil in elevated carbon dioxide conditions, or to diversify crops to include protein-rich legumes such as beans and peas or iron-rich spinach. The food industry could also fortify salts or other foods with iron and zinc, Myers added.

Myers thinks a combination of approaches will be necessary to address this issue. “All of these countermeasures have their own set of problems,” he said. “I don’t think there’s going to be a single easy fix.”

Ker Than is a freelance writer living in the Bay Area. He tweets at @kerthan.

Originally posted on Inside Science News Service.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Elevated CO2 robs crops of nutrients, say scientists
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Latest-News-Wires/2014/0507/Elevated-CO2-robs-crops-of-nutrients-say-scientists
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe