Could the Earth be getting greener? Satellite data say yes.

A study of satellite data has found that terrestrial vegetation has increased lately. 

|
David Gray/Reuters
Roads can be seen intersecting drought-affected farming areas located in south-eastern Australia March 21, 2015. A report titled 'Thirsty Country: Climate change and drought in Australia' by the Australian research body the Climate Council, has argued in its latest paper that the probability of drought will increase, and it will become more severe, because of climate change. The crowdfunded body claimed that since the mid-1990s rainfall in southeast Australia had declined between 15 and 20 per cent, and due to a warming climate, rain across southern Australia had "shifted" further south increasing the risk of drought in south-east and south-west Australia.

Despite decades of deforestation and environmental damage, a recent study published in Nature Climate Change found that, lately, the Earth has been getting a bit greener.

Researchers Yi Liu, Albert Van Dijk, and Pep Canadell discovered that between 2003 and 2012, the amount of vegetation above ground increased by 4 billion metric tons of carbon.

The new vegetation was mapped over a period of two decades using a method called passive microwave remote sensing, in which satellites measure radiofrequency radiation emitted from the Earth. Just about everything emits a small amounts of electromagnetic radiation in the same frequencies as radio waves, and these emissions carry information about the temperature and moisture content of the object emitting it. Using this data, scientists are able to tell what is and what isn't vegetation.

“We extracted this vegetation information from several satellites and merged them into one time series covering the last two decades,” Liu, Van Dijk and Canadell wrote in The Conversation. “This allowed us to track global changes in biomass from month to month, something that was not possible before.”

The study showed improvement particularly in former Soviet nations, where forests have gradually grown on abandoned farmland; in China, which has implemented massive tree planting campaigns; and arid areas like the savannas of Africa, Australia, and South America.

The increase of vegetation in the savannas was most surprising to the researchers, but also not as promising.

"Savannas and shrublands are vulnerable to rainfall – one year can be very wet, and more carbon will be fixed in plants, but the next year can be very dry, and then we will lose the carbon fixed in previous years," Liu told Reuters.

This new growth offsets nearly half of the carbon loss due to deforestation in the Amazon and southeast Asia.

The added vegetation is also good for the environment, because plants remove carbon dioxide from the air during photosynthesis, removing harmful greenhouse gases trapped in the atmosphere. Plants absorb roughly one quarter of the emissions released into the atmosphere by humans burning fossil fuels, and the oceans absorb another quarter.

The study did not look at the correlation between the added plant growth and the the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. But given that energy consumption alone accounted for 32 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions, those four billion additional tons of carbon in terrestrial plants made only a minimal difference.

"From this research, we can see these plants can help absorb some carbon dioxide, but there's still a lot of carbon dioxide staying in the atmosphere," Liu told Reuters. "If we want to stabilize the current level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere – and avoid the consequent impacts – it still requires us to reduce fossil fuel emissions."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Could the Earth be getting greener? Satellite data say yes.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Energy/2015/0331/Could-the-Earth-be-getting-greener-Satellite-data-say-yes.
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe