Skip to footer

In Lac-Megantic disaster, oil train operators face criminal charges

The rail line involved in the 2013 Lac-Megantic oil train derailment, which killed 47 people, now faces criminal charges for breaking Canadian safety and environmental laws. The disaster raised questions about oil train safety throughout North America.

|
Paul Chiasson/The Canadian Press/AP/File
Smoke rises from railway cars carrying crude oil after derailing in downtown Lac Megantic, Quebec on July 6, 2013.

Criminal charges have been filed against the rail line involved in the huge oil train crash in Lac-Megantic, Quebec, that killed 47 people in 2013, along with a subsidiary and several individuals for allegedly violating Canadian safety and environmental laws.

Montreal Maine & Atlantic Canada Railway Ltd. (MM&A), the now-bankrupt railroad based in Hermon, Maine, and its subsidiary, the Montreal Maine & Atlantic Canada Co., were charged with breaking the federal Railway Safety Act and the Fisheries Act.

The individuals charged on June 22 under the Railroad Safety act were Robert Grindrod, the CEO of the railroad, and the train’s driver, Thomas Harding. Also charged were Lynne Labonté, the company’s general manager of transportation; Kenneth Strout, director of operating practices; Jean Demaitre, manager of train operations; and Mike Horan, assistant transportation director. (Related: Latest DOE Report Slams Canada’s Oil Sands)

Environment Canada didn’t immediately release the identities of those charged under the Fisheries Act, who are accused of allowing oil and other foreign substances to leak into the lake and the Chaudiere River, fouling the water and killing many fish.

Grindrod said by voicemail from his home in Maine that he had not been formally served with the charges and knew about them only through the news media. As a result, he said, “I am not going to say anything based on that.”

The charges were based on the results of an investigation by Transport Canada, which said that a 72-car MM&A train carrying crude oil from North Dakota rolled down a hill and derailed on the early morning of July 6, 2013, in the small Quebec town about 160 miles east of Montreal.

The train, unattended, was supposed to have stayed in place, but the probe determined that only seven handbrakes on the train had been set, and that they had been improperly tested to ensure that the train could not roll free. (Related: Major Shift In Asian Commodity Demand Already Underway)

 

The train derailed and exploded in flames, destroying 40 buildings and killing 47 people, either as they enjoyed a summer’s night out in the lakeside town or as they were sleeping. It was the deadliest rail disaster in North America in the past two decades.

Violations of the Railway Safety Act are punishable by fines of up to C$1 million for companies and as much as $50,000 and six months in prison for individuals. There are stricter penalties for violations of the Fisheries Act.

The charges come amid a court fight over the disposition of a $430 million settlement for the families of those killed in the disaster. One companies expected to contribute to the fund is Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. (CP), which handled the first leg of the oil’s journey from North Dakota. It relayed the task to MM&A in Montreal, before the accident occurred and has refused to contribute. (Related: Why Buffett Bet A Billion On Solar)

CP argues that it played no role in the accident and that as a result the Quebec court considering the case lacked jurisdiction. If CP’s argument is accepted, compensation to victims’ families could be delayed for years.

One of those who would receive such a payout is Raymond Lafontaine, a local businessman who lost his son, two daughters-in-law and an employee in the accident. He told The Globe and Mail of Toronto that even two years after the accident, investigators have yet to get to the bottom of the accident.

“I agree there should be justice, but … it feels like we’re still looking for people to blame,” Lafontaine said.

He said he suspects more senior officials of MM&A are responsible and should be held accountable for the disaster, but held out little hope that all the guilty parties would be identified. “We’re going to bring this to our graves,” he said.

By Andy Tully Of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Original story: http://oilprice.com/The-Environment/Oil-Spills/Criminal-Charges-Filed-In-Lac-Megantic-Oil-Train-Disaster.html

Source: http://oilprice.com/

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to In Lac-Megantic disaster, oil train operators face criminal charges
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Energy-Voices/2015/0629/In-Lac-Megantic-disaster-oil-train-operators-face-criminal-charges
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe