Is California the next fracking frontier?

California's Monterey Shale formation contains more shale oil than anywhere else in the country, but its geology and dry climate make it difficult to extract. Extremely dry conditions are also taking a toll on California's power plants.  

|
Lucy Nicholson/Reuters/File
A pumpjack drills for oil in the Monterey Shale in California. The Monterey Shale is estimated to hold more shale oil than anywhere else in the country.

Every day, the average American uses nearly 1,500 gallons of water: 190 gallons for his home and business, 600 gallons to grow his food and fiber, and 673 gallons for the industries that make his goods and supply services, including energy.

These practices are unsustainable in the long term, but in water-short California they’re already coming to a head. Amid two years of extremely dry conditions and with summer coming, California utilities are scrambling to ensure that they will be allocated enough water to cool their power plants to produce enough electricity to meet the state’s air-conditioning needs.

But what really makes California a focal point is the Monterey Shale formation that stretches from Central California to Southern California. It holds more shale oil than anywhere else in the country – bigger than the Bakken shale formation, bigger than the Eagle Ford. Think North Dakota’s Bakken times four.

But environmentalists say that the Monterey can’t be tapped because of the lack of water. Hydraulic fracturing (or fracking), the controversial method by which producers extract tight oil and gas, uses seven times the amount of water as does the exploration of traditional natural gas. 

Fracking uses a mix of water, sand, and chemicals to break free the resources. Technologies are being developed that would recycle that water, albeit one that -- for now -- is an expensive solution.

Even in normal times, there’s not enough water to take full potential of the shale formation. But that issue is not what is delaying a Monterey Shale revolution. Those obstacles are tied more to the type of geological formation that exist in California: “The drought is a red herring,” says Rock Zierman, chief executive of the California Independent Petroleum Association in Sacramento, in an interview.

Instead, California’s drillers, which produce 10 percent of this nation’s oil, which is equal to that of Alaska, use single-stage vertical drilling. That is different from multi-stage hydraulic fracturing, which is used in North Dakota and Texas.

Moreover, as of January, producers there undergo what Mr. Zierman describes as the nation’s most stringent set of drilling laws. That is, they must test for water quality before and after production as well as ensure well integrity and report the use of any chemicals that are used to explore.

“With greater competition for water between public and private sectors, look for even greater scrutiny on energy companies’ fracking activities” not just in California but also around the country, says Tony Calandro, a senior partner in the corporate sustainability practice at VOX, a communications firm, in an interview.

Not only is energy development water intensive. So, too, is electricity generation. And they both compete with other industrial concerns, farmers, recreational centers and small residential households for access to it. 

 “The California drought heightens the importance for the energy sector, with its already contentious water use, to make robust water risks-management planning a priority,” says Jason Morrison, program director for the Pacific Institute, an environmental organization based in Oakland, Calif., in an interview.

The Pacific Institute, along with VOX Global, surveyed 50 companies that include AT&T, MillerCoors and Union Pacific Railroad to discuss their concerns over potential water shortages. They maintain that nearly 60 percent of the responding companies said that water is poised to negatively affect business growth and profitability within five years. More than 80 percent of those who responded said that water issues would affect where they choose to locate.

The silver lining is that California’s 18 power plants can be retrofitted with new water-saving technologies.

Utilities now use “once-through cooling” that returns nearly all water to its original source. Newer mechanisms use “closed loop” systems that recirculate the water.

The demand for new energy will assuredly increase, potentially putting developers and utilities at odds with other types of businesses, and consumers. New technologies, though, could ease those conflicts, although any water scarcities won’t go noticed until the lights start to flicker or the bills start to escalate. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Is California the next fracking frontier?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Energy-Voices/2014/0411/Is-California-the-next-fracking-frontier
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe