Obama renames Mt. McKinley: Political posturing or rightful restoration?

President Obama's decision to officially rename Alaska's highest peak Denali has drawn criticism from some unlikely places.

|
Andy Newman/Holland America Line/AP/File
A woman gazes at Mount McKinley in Denali National Park and Preserve in Alaska, Aug. 3. On Sunday, the White House said that President Obama will change the name of North America's highest peak to Denali restoring an Alaska Native name with deep cultural significance.

President Obama has kicked off his three-day visit to Alaska by officially restoring Denali as the name of North America’s tallest peak.

His decision ends a 40-year battle over what to call the 20,300-foot mountain.

The federal government named it Mount McKinley in 1896 after a gold prospector exploring the region heard that Ohioan William McKinley, a supporter of the gold standard, had won the Republican nomination for president.

But to Alaska natives the mountain has always been Denali, “the high one” in Athabascan. The Alaskan government sided with them in 1975, when it officially restored the original name and started to push Washington to do the same.

Now it’s Ohioans who are fighting back. Ohio lawmakers have widely denounced Mr. Obama’s decision to strip the peak of its name honoring their state’s native son, who served as president from 1897 until his assassination in 1901.

"This political stunt is insulting to all Ohioans, and I will be working with the House Committee on Natural Resources to determine what can be done to prevent this action," Rep. Bob Gibbs (R) of Ohio told the Associated Press.

House Speaker John Boehner said he was deeply disappointed in the decision to rename the mountain. But with Interior Secretary Sally Jewell given the legal authority to rename the mountain, it appears likely to stick, at least for now.

The decision has received widespread praise in Alaska, a staunch Republican state that has not been widely supportive of Obama.

"I'd like to thank the president for working with us to achieve this significant change to show honor, respect, and gratitude to the Athabascan people of Alaska," Senator Lisa Murkowski (R) of Alaska, who led the fight for the Denali name in Congress, told Reuters.

Obama’s bigger challenge over the next three days will be to rally support for his climate change agenda. He hopes to raise the sense of urgency by calling attention to Alaska’s threatened wildlife and stunning natural beauty. As the AP reports:

Obama and [Secretary of State John] Kerry are intensely focused on a global climate treaty that nations hope to finalize in December, as the president works to secure his environmental legacy before leaving office. The president has pledged a U.S. cut in greenhouse gas emissions of up to 28 percent by 2030, compared to 2005 levels, and planned to use the Alaska visit to press other nations to commit to similarly ambitious measures.

An oil-rich state, Alaska is likely to prove less receptive to Obama’s proposed regulations to reduce carbon emissions.

This report includes material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Obama renames Mt. McKinley: Political posturing or rightful restoration?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2015/0831/Obama-renames-Mt.-McKinley-Political-posturing-or-rightful-restoration
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe