Skip to footer

One drop at a time: California surpasses water conservation target

Water use in the Golden State fell by 27 percent last month, despite it being the hottest June on record globally.

|
Lucy Nicholson/Reuters
Workers install artificial turf in the yard of a home in Los Angeles, Calif., on Tuesday. California is in its fourth year of a catastrophic drought.
  • By Sanya Mansoor Staff writer

Water use in California fell by 27 percent last month, surpassing Gov. Jerry Brown's ambitious conservation target, regulators said Thursday.

Historically, water savings occurs during unusually wet months but last month's decline came amid the world's hottest June on record.

"The June numbers tell a story of conscious conservation, and that's what we need and are applauding today," Felicia Marcus, chairwoman of the water board told the Associated Press. "We need to save as much as possible. That is water essentially in the bank for a future dry year or more."

In April, Governor Brown ordered an overall 25 percent reduction in urban water use compared to 2013 levels, the state's first-ever mandatory restrictions. His administration gave each community nine months to hit assigned conservation targets as high as 36 percent.

Two-thirds of local water agencies (265 out of 411) met or nearly reached the savings target, according to data released by the State Water Resources Control Board.

The agencies that met or came within 1 percent of their mandatory water conservation target serve 27 million Californians.

Agencies that did not approach targets will be asked to account for what measures they are taking to conserve, the water board said. The worst performers will need to ramp up enforcement of water restrictions or impose new ones.

The government became stricter about enforcing these targets, last month. Agencies issued more than 9,500 penalties compared with about 1,900 in May.

Throughout the drought, there have been disagreements about who should be expected to cut back on water. Brown faced considerable criticism during the winter and spring months for not including the state's farmers in mandatory restrictions. Estimates of California's agricultural footprint suggest that farms account for as much as 80 percent of water use. In June, Brown extended cuts to include farmers with historic water rights.

But Ted Sheely, a farmer in California, wrote an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal that argued the statistic is a “fabrication of environmentalists who want to disguise that they use even more water than farmers.”

Either way, California has a water crisis to solve.

The state is currently working to implement broad reforms, which include water-recycling projects and groundwater pumping restrictions, in addition to mandatory cuts.

This report includes material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to One drop at a time: California surpasses water conservation target
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2015/0730/One-drop-at-a-time-California-surpasses-water-conservation-target
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe