There are basically two big forests left, say scientists

Researches funded by the Natural Science Foundation have found that the Earth is left with two large forests, with all remaining wooded areas being relatively fragmented, and growing more so. 

|
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/File/AP
This 2005 photo provided by the US Fish and Wildlife Service shows Jarbidge River floodwaters eroding part of the South Canyon Road near Jarbidge in northeastern Nevada. Increased forest fragmentation over the decades has had profound impacts on all forms of wildlife.

The world's forests are becoming more and more isolated. 

So much so that the only two remaining continuous forests are in the South America and Africa, and they are strikingly larger than any other tree-covered area visible via satellite imagery, according to an international team of 24 scientists, who published their findings in the journal Science Advances.

“There are really only two big patches of intact forest left on Earth — the Amazon and the Congo — and they shine out like eyes from the center of the map,” lead author Nick Haddad, a professor at North Carolina State University, told the New Yorker. 

The forests that remain are relatively fragmented. Almost twenty percent of forested land lies roughly the length of a football field away from its edge; almost 70 percent of forested land is within half a mile of the forest's edge.

This fragmentation takes a huge toll on living things. The team found that fragmented habitats lose, on average, half of their plant and animal species within 20 years.

"Once a forest disappears, the resulting area is more exposed and experiences greater extremes of temperature, humidity, and wind – all of which negatively influence plants and animals in nearby forest”, says Doug Levey, Program Officer with the National Science Foundation and co-author of the paper. "Furthermore the forest community becomes threatened by invasion of numerous non-native species that typically inhabit disturbed, open habitats.” 

Part of what made this study so comprehensive was the longevity of some of the experiments, Dr. Levey said. When landscapes are disrupted by humans, it’s notoriously difficult to attribute negative impacts only to fragmentation; many other factors may also play roles in the decline of plants and animals in the remaining habitat. The advantage of the experiments conducted for this study was that they were designed to isolate fragmentation effects from all other types of effects. Furthermore, they were conducted in many places, by many researchers, and for generally long times.  "No matter the scale, habitat or, organism the effects of fragmentation were universally bad," Levey said.

The paper highlights the fact that effects of fragmentation are only visible over a prolonged period of time. One possible way to slow down fragmentation's effect on forest habitats is to connect nearby clumps of forest and create a corridor of trees to connect those clumps, says Levey. 

"It's never too late to preserve what we already have," he says, "People have known for a long time that fragmentation is bad and it's getting worse."  

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to There are basically two big forests left, say scientists
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2015/0323/There-are-basically-two-big-forests-left-say-scientists
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe