Antarctic fur seals, once hunted to near extinction, now face climate threat

Antarctic fur seals, a conservation success story, now aren't getting enough to eat. A new study links the decline of the seals to a drop in the krill population, caused by warming oceans.

|
Alister Doyle/Reuters/File
A seal swims by icebergs off the British Antarctic Survey's Rothera base, January 23, 2009.

Climate change appears to be pulling the ecological rug out from under a once-stable population of Antarctic fur seals. Their numbers on a remote island in the South Atlantic are falling, even though an increasing proportion of survivors are displaying greater genetic variation – a trait generally thought to boost an organism's ability to adapt to environmental stress.

That's the pattern a pair of scientists has detected in a new study of the seal population, which researchers have been scrutinizing for 31 years at the level of individual seals as well as at the wider population level.

The work has implications beyond the seals themselves, the researchers say.

The seals, which feed on Antarctic krill, sit near the top of the food chain, notes Joe Hoffman, a molecular ecologist at Bielefeld University in Bielefeld, Germany, and one of the two scientists reporting the results in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature.

As a result, the seals tend to reflect the general health of the ecosystem they inhabit and so are "an indicator for many other species," he explains.

Until the 1990s, the seals inhabiting the South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands, some 1,100 miles east of the southern tip of South America, represented a good-news conservation story. The seals there were nearly hunted to extinction during the 19th century. By the 1990s, the number of seals had rebounded to a population estimated at about 3 million and considered stable. In the colony the two researchers studied, however, the number of breeding females fell by by 25 percent over the past 27 years.

"The motive for this study was to find out what was causing the decline and if the cause of the decline was a problem for the entire ecosystem as a whole," Dr. Hoffman says.

Hoffman and Jaume Forcada, a biologist with the British Antarctic Survey and the study's lead author, focused on females, because they reach reproductive maturity and come ashore to breed when they are three-to-four years old. Over 30 years, data accumulated on many generations of offspring. Males, on the other hand, don't start coming ashore until they are about 10 years old and are big enough to tangle with already established males in the breeding colony.

In addition to the general decline in breeding females during the past 27 years, female pups on average weighed 7.8 percent less at birth than they did in the '90s. The average time span covered by a generation shrank from 13.7 to 6.1 years. And the number of females whose genetic makeup displayed the least variety fell by 17 percent, boosting the proportion of females with high genetic variation. Yet this high genetic variation, which increases the likelihood that an individual will survive the tougher environmental conditions, can't be passed from mother to pups, the researchers note.

Females that reached reproductive age and returned to the island to breed tended to be among the larger, older females and generally bore their first pups a year later than they did in the '90s, the researchers found.

These patterns tend to be associated with animals facing food shortages. In exploring the factors determining the abundance and distribution of krill, climate patterns are crucial, the team notes. In particular, they point to a band of high-altitude winds encircling Antarctica. The band expands and contracts on average in a cycle known as the Southern Annular Mode.

Between 2003 and 2012, the mode entered a phase in which the band of high-altitude winds generally contracted toward the South Pole, allowing warmer water to migrate farther south into regions where the seals gulp krill. When the water warms, krill populations fall.

Overall, the breeding population of females dropped by 30 percent during this period.

This phase has been attributed to a combination of the ozone hole over Antarctica and global warming, and models project an increase in the persistence of the phase with additional warming. 

Hoffman notes that within about five years, it should be possible to begin exploring genetic variability among male seals.

"We might expect even more extreme effects simply because the male mating system is much more competitive," he says.

What sets this study apart from others that have tried to look at the effects of climate change on populations of animals is the long records on individual seals, their sizes, weights, and genetic information.

Armed with these data, "we can obtain very clear evidence that as the climate is changed, it's getting more difficult for these animals to get by," he says, because conditions are changing faster than the animals can evolve to adapt to the changes.

Given fur seals' bellwether status and the range of other species that rely on the same source of food, Hoffman says it's possible that other species in the Southern Ocean may be experiencing similar changes.

He and Dr. Forcada speculate, however, that as environmental conditions get worse, natural selection could lead the genetic diversity within individuals to become dominant enough to persist in the population, better equipping it to adapt to future changes.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Antarctic fur seals, once hunted to near extinction, now face climate threat
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2014/0724/Antarctic-fur-seals-once-hunted-to-near-extinction-now-face-climate-threat
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe