2020
March
11
Wednesday

Monitor Daily Podcast

March 11, 2020
Loading the player...
Mark Sappenfield
Senior global correspondent

Today’s issue includes a different view of the coronavirus outbreak from the Mideast, the secret of Joe Biden’s success, a women’s uprising in Mexico, the hope of young Afghans, and the world’s humblest national archives.

But first a look at big news from today.

When the six accusers present at Harvey Weinstein’s sentencing Wednesday left the courtroom, they were greeted by impromptu cheers. Just as they had walked in together – in solidarity and support – they walked out together.

In between, something momentous had occurred. A judge sentenced him to 23 years in prison for rape and sexual assault. It was not the maximum 29 years prosecutors had suggested, but it was substantially more than the five proposed by the defense. Quite simply, the women made their case – and were heard.

The case had come to embody so much of the #MeToo movement. If this wealthy, well-connected media mogul could not be brought to account for flagrant crimes that were an open secret for years, what claim to progress could really be made? Instead, the sentence is “a watershed moment in society’s understanding that rape is about abuse of power,” tweeted Equality Now, a women’s rights group.

The six accusers in the courtroom cried and hugged each other as the sentence was announced. They had been there for each other. As they left to applause, the hope is that perhaps now other survivors might feel that society and the legal system will be there for them, too. 

Model Tarale Wulff testified at the trial because she wanted to help others. But, she added, “I am also worth standing up for.”


You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Today’s stories

And why we wrote them

The fight against coronavirus requires collaboration, and in a time of crisis that can bridge even the most entrenched divides. Look no further than Israelis and Palestinians.

How did Joe Biden’s fortunes in the Democratic presidential race change so dramatically? We help you sort through some of the variables.

Eduardo Verdugo/AP
Male cashiers work in a supermarket during a women's strike in Mexico City March 9, 2020. Thousands of women across Mexico stayed home for “A Day Without Women,” after an unprecedented number of them filled the streets to protest gender violence on International Women's Day.

In Mexico, violence against women has long been quietly accepted amid a culture of machismo. But the country appears to be near a tipping point.

Scott Peterson/Getty Images/The Christian Science Monitor
Afghan Member of Parliament Shogofa Noorzai, seen here at her office on March 4, 2020, in Kabul, Afghanistan, is anxious about what a US-Taliban withdrawal deal will mean for hard-won gains for Afghan women, children, and civil society.

Many young Afghans who have come of age since the fall of the Taliban are skeptical of a new peace deal. Instead, their hopes rest in the power of what they have gained.

Ryan Lenora Brown/The Christian Science Monitor
Hargeisa Cultural Center founder Jama Musse Jama, a mathematician and publisher, poses in front of one of the many murals scattered throughout the complex.

This book lover from Somaliland launched a library to bring the world home. But his carefully curated archives send another message, too: Our own history, our culture – our humanity – matter just as much.


The Monitor's View

Reuters
During a campaign stop in Iowa, former Vice President Joe Biden points at an old campaign pin showing him in a much-earlier election race.

The so-called greatest generation that reached adulthood in time to serve in World War II produced U.S. presidents from John F. Kennedy to Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. The mantle then passed to postwar baby boomers: Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama.

Maybe – belatedly – it is the silent generation, sandwiched in between those two cohorts, that now may have its turn.

Both of the final major candidates in the Democratic primary, Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders, fall into this generational no man’s land. They were born during World War II. President Donald Trump, born just after the war, is officially a boomer.

In recent years the United States elected its first African American president and nearly elected its first woman, Hillary Clinton (although she took the popular vote). During this latest Democratic primary, with its unprecedented diversity of candidates, voters whittled down the choice to Mr. Biden and Mr. Sanders in the end. By the current standards of diversity, they are widely perceived as simply old white men.

Indeed, all three candidates are older than the three most recently retired presidents: Messrs. Clinton, Bush, and Obama. And whoever wins the election in November, he will be the oldest person to hold the office.

Yet that should not be the focus. Life expectancy charts show Americans in their mid-to-late 70s can, on average, live another decade or more – plenty of time to serve a term as president. The real question is not about age but competence. Does a candidate have the energy and acumen to do the job regardless of age?

Those who study aging say common beliefs about older people have radically changed. Yet we are still in unexplored territory. Having the oldest president will be both a sign of the times and a signal for a more expansive view of aging.

“We do know plenty of people are doing all kinds of other stressful work into their 80s,” Louise Aronson, a geriatrician at the University of California, San Francisco, told The New Yorker, “and also that being president should be a team sport. It’s about the ability to use good judgment to surround yourself with really good, competent people and manage them.”

Concern about the age of the current candidates will put a magnifying glass on their choice of running mates, notably their youth and qualifications. Mr. Biden has openly talked about serving only one term. Mr. Trump, if he wins, cannot run again.

With so many seniors breaking mental and physical barriers these days, the U.S. is ripe for a test of its presumed limitations about the age of a president. Even as this year’s candidates are showing youthful vigor, voters can show some rigor in updating views about aging.


A Christian Science Perspective

About this feature

Each weekday, the Monitor includes one clearly labeled religious article offering spiritual insight on contemporary issues, including the news. The publication – in its various forms – is produced for anyone who cares about the progress of the human endeavor around the world and seeks news reported with compassion, intelligence, and an essentially constructive lens. For many, that caring has religious roots. For many, it does not. The Monitor has always embraced both audiences. The Monitor is owned by a church – The First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Boston – whose founder was concerned with both the state of the world and the quality of available news.

It can sometimes feel as if there’s little we can do to make a difference in healing the world’s problems. But as a woman experienced firsthand while witnessing a racial conflict, the desire to see others as God does has healing effect.


A message of love

Adriano Machado/Reuters
An indigenous man protests in defense of the demarcation of indigenous lands, in front of the Justice Ministry in Brasilia, Brazil March 11, 2020.
( The illustrations in today’s Monitor Daily are by Jacob Turcotte. )

A look ahead

Thank you for joining us today. Please come back tomorrow when our Francine Kiefer examines whether the concerns around coronavirus are shaping Americans’ views of health care and access to it.

More issues

2020
March
11
Wednesday

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.