2018
August
07
Tuesday

Monitor Daily Podcast

August 07, 2018
Loading the player...

The sweeping ban Monday by Apple, Facebook, and YouTube on content produced by conspiracy broadcaster Alex Jones poses intriguing moral questions about hate speech and free speech rights.

Conservatives aren’t defending Mr. Jones’s wild theories. But some are concerned about censorship. “I don’t support Alex Jones and what InfoWars produces. He’s not a conservative. However, banning him and his outlet is wrong,” writes Brent Bozell of the conservative Media Research Center. “Social media sites are supposedly neutral platforms, but they are increasingly becoming opportunities for the left and major media to censor any content that they don’t like,” he says.

Conservative columnist David French writes that Jones “has no regard for truth or decency [and] is finally getting what he deserves,” adding that “there is no First Amendment violation when a private company chooses to boot anyone off a private platform.” In a New York Times opinion piece, Mr. French writes that “hate speech” is too vague a standard for censorship. He suggests social media companies challenge untruths with libel and slander law.

America is navigating an era of pervasive falsehoods and of testing the limits of the First Amendment (religious speech, printing of 3-D guns, kneeling at NFL games). There are no simple answers. But these cases challenge all Americans to check their own moral compass, as voting members of a democratic society.

Now to our five selected stories, including closing the gender pay gap in Georgia and a cultural gap for students in Boston.


You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Today’s stories

And why we wrote them

Max Rossi/Reuters
A man cools off as he waits for Pope Francis to lead a prayer Aug. 5 in Vatican City. Temperatures across Europe – and around the world – have soared.

Record heat in the Northern Hemisphere is prompting people to wonder why this summer is so hot. As temperatures rise, perceptions of climate change are shifting.

During a US presidential campaign, what’s legal – or illegal – when it comes to getting help from foreigners? Our reporter takes a closer look at the 2016 meeting between Trump campaign workers and a Russian lawyer.

Charlottesville: Lives changed

One year after
Norm Shafer/ For The Washington Post/Getty Images
Teen activist Zyahna Bryant wrote a petition in 2016, when she was a high school freshman, asking the city of Charlottesville, Va., to take down a statue of Robert E. Lee.

As part of our series this week on Charlottesville, Va., our reporter spoke to high school activist Zyahna Bryant, whose efforts to confront a symbol of racism sparked a series of events that exposed the entrenched injustices in her city.

Chamblee, Ga., tops the handful of US cities where women make more money than men. But this situation is more of a window on persistent challenges than a recipe for closing the gender pay gap.

Here’s another “gap” story. It turns out that how kids spend their summer can influence their performance when they go back to school. Here's a look at efforts to close this cultural and academic divide.


The Monitor's View

AP Photo
New York Daily News staff reporter Chelsia Rose Marcius cries as she leaves the newspaper's office after she was laid off July 23. The tabloid will cut half of its newsroom staff, saying it wants to focus more on digital news.

When the Daily News, a 99-year-old print tabloid that considers itself New York’s “hometown newspaper,” laid off half its journalists last month, the reaction was swift. The mayor called it a disaster for the city. New York’s governor called it devastating.

Loyal readers and others wondered how they could cope with the loss of local coverage, especially the paper’s role as a watchdog on officialdom.

The public outcry, while not matched by the necessary subscriptions to maintain the newspaper in its old glory, nonetheless revealed just how much consumers of mass media – a term first used for newspapers – still want to feel connected to their hometown and to each other. The reaction showed a continuing need for whole communities to feel … well, whole.

Robust local journalism has long provided the social glue for a community’s cohesion, even defining its character. It helps mediate the relationship of individuals to local institutions by chronicling the troubles and triumphs of the day. And yet the number of local newspapers has been in steady decline, a result of steep losses in advertising and circulation as Americans rely more on social media for “free” news.

In the past decade, the number of newsroom employees at newspapers has fallen by 45 percent, from about 71,000 workers in 2008 to 39,000 in 2017, according to the Pew Research Center report last month. An increase in similar jobs for digital news outlets – about 6,000 – has been far below what is needed to compensate for the loss of local journalists.

Just seven years ago, famed investor Warren Buffett bought dozens of local newspapers that he considered to be the bedrock of their communities despite competition from digital outlets. Last May, Mr. Buffett acknowledged his disappointment in the investment. “It is very difficult to see ... how the print product survives over time,” he said. Yet “the sage of Omaha” is still keeping the papers – which are a small drag on his giant portfolio – because of a strong belief that the significance of daily newspapers to society is “enormous.”

Some historical context might help explain this longing for what local news can do.

Susan Zieger, a professor of English at the University of California, Riverside, writes in a new book, “The Mediated Mind: Affect, Ephemera, and Consumerism in the Nineteenth Century,” that print was the first form of mass media and that the skyrocketing circulation of newspapers in the 1890s revealed a desire among people to be connected.

By then, Americans were more literate and had more leisure time to read. Ink, paper, and printing presses were cheaper, which led to the birth of mass media. News consumers could compare the cultural norms presented in print and adjust themselves to them. “Suddenly, people have all this information, which parallels our current situation with screens,” she states.

The explosion of print media brought forth powerful yearnings: “To share beliefs and opinions with a large community, to unite with others below the threshold of consciousness, reflected a dream of wholeness through public affect and thought...,” she writes.

While much of America’s mass media are national, it is local news where people can really “dream of wholeness.” And if local news is ever to be revived, it may ride on the coattails of a movement toward “localism,” or more reliance on a local economy, local food, and small communities.

This trend is reflected in the fact that, despite falling trust in many institutions over several decades, Americans remain trusting of their local institutions, according to Gallup polling. One poll last year found 70 percent of people have confidence in their local governments to do the right thing.

Yet according to a new book by scholars Bruce Katz and Jeremy Nowak, “The New Localism,” this go-local movement is not the same as local government. A range of civic groups are coming together with a shared identity to embrace their community. The phenomenon has lately been reported by pundits like Tom Friedman, James Fallows, and David Brooks. In his recent article for The Atlantic, Mr. Fallows writes:

“One to-do step for citizens: Subscribe to local publications while they still exist. A to-do step for plutocrats and philanthropists: View news-gathering as a crucial part of the public infrastructure of this era, just as Carnegies, Rockefellers, and Mellons viewed libraries, museums, and universities as part of the necessary infrastructure of their time.”

Many people with big money, such as Buffett, as well as nonprofit foundations and even the state of New Jersey, are testing new models for viable local journalism. Yet these experiments rely on Americans once again becoming big boosters of local news. The “dream of wholeness” will not disappear.


A Christian Science Perspective

About this feature

Each weekday, the Monitor includes one clearly labeled religious article offering spiritual insight on contemporary issues, including the news. The publication – in its various forms – is produced for anyone who cares about the progress of the human endeavor around the world and seeks news reported with compassion, intelligence, and an essentially constructive lens. For many, that caring has religious roots. For many, it does not. The Monitor has always embraced both audiences. The Monitor is owned by a church – The First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Boston – whose founder was concerned with both the state of the world and the quality of available news.

Today’s contributor reflects on what it means to cherish – and live – pure values.


A message of love

John Minchillo/AP
Carson Dunn, age 18, votes for the first time in a polling station at Genoa Baptist Church Aug. 7 in Westerville, Ohio. The script for Ohio’s special election is perhaps familiar: An experienced Trump loyalist, two-term state Sen. Troy Balderson, is fighting off a challenge from Democrat Danny O’Connor, a 31-year-old county official, in a congressional district held by the Republican Party for more than three decades.
( The illustrations in today’s Monitor Daily are by Jacob Turcotte. )

A look ahead

Thanks for joining us. Come back tomorrow. We’re working on a story about the deadly weekend in Chicago and how mothers, cops, and big data are helping one community there reduce crime.

More issues

2018
August
07
Tuesday

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.