2017
June
27
Tuesday

Monitor Daily Podcast

June 27, 2017
Loading the player...

Gatherings of world leaders are marked by formality and protocol, often orchestrated to avoid offense. But India’s prime minister offers a refreshingly bold take on those stiff relationship-building exercises.

Narendra Modi’s signature move with world leaders is the bear hug.

The BBC offers an admiring analysis of Mr. Modi’s technique, which in President Trump’s case, began with a slow handshake that deftly slipped into a full embrace, exhibiting all the precision and grace of a martial arts move. Modi hugged Mr. Trump three times during his two-day Washington visit. After an awkward start, Trump reciprocated.

Yes, Monitor editors are aware that Europe was hit by a serious ransomware attack Tuesday. You may recall that a similar attack in May was stopped cold by an alert 22-year-old in Britain.  

But we digress. Rather than focus on events that may instill fear, we wanted to take a moment to highlight the effectiveness of a simple embrace.


You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Today’s stories

And why we wrote them

There’s one word that keeps tripping up Republican efforts to replace the Affordable Care Act: It’s “affordable.” We look at the recurring potholes in the path to progress on health care.

James Lawler Duggan/Reuters
International passengers arrived at Washington Dulles International Airport on June 26, the day the US Supreme Court granted parts of the Trump administration’s emergency request to put its travel ban into effect later in the week, pending further judicial review. The court said it would address the case in October.

As we’ve noted, perspective matters. In this next story, we delve into why US Supreme Court justices look at the Trump travel ban through a very different legal lens.

Bandar Algaloud/Saudi Royal Court/Reuters
Mohammed bin Salman, then the Saudi deputy crown prince, entered a meeting with Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in April. By announcing the prince as heir to the throne, the Saudi royal family appears set to usher in a generation of princes and kings they say is more in tune with – and at the age of – their Saudi subjects.

A shift in power in Saudi Arabia is not just a generational one. It also portends a shift for the roles of women, the economy, and global relationships that could challenge the influence of the kingdom’s conservative clerics.  

Is auto insurance the new black civil rights issue? In Detroit, the mayor is charting a path to restore fair pricing.

New research suggests that too much news makes discerning the truth more difficult. In our next story, we look at how to break the “hypnotism” of info overload.


The Monitor's View

Alexandre Meneghini/Reuters
A group of tourists from the United States take a guided bicycle tour of Havana, Cuba, June 17.

For more than half a century US presidents have wrestled with Cuba. Fidel Castro’s communist revolution in 1959 turned what had been a friendly nearby island escape for American tourists into a defiantly independent – and potentially dangerous – foe.

An early failed US attempt to overthrow Mr. Castro was followed by an economic blockade and, eventually, by the Cuban missile crisis – a stare-down with Cuba’s patron, the Soviet Union, that threatened to end in nuclear war.

Over the decades US presidents of both parties have tried sticks of various sizes and types to force Castro to leave, or at least move toward a more open and democratic system of government. None has succeeded. So when late in his presidency Barack Obama decided to dangle carrots instead – restoring diplomatic ties and easing travel restrictions – many Americans were ready to give the new approach a try.

But in mid-June President Trump, the 12th inhabitant of the White House to deal with the Castro regime, made a dramatic announcement that seemed to end that short-lived experiment. His new policy tries to divert US tourist dollars away from hotels, restaurants, and other companies run by the Cuban military by restricting where Americans can stay and requiring them to travel only as part of supervised tour groups.

The details of how the new policy will play out won’t be known for many months. But it appears many of the Obama changes will remain. Cruise ships will continue to dock and airplanes will continue to land filled with passengers from the United States, though where visitors may spend their money will be more restricted.

The new restrictions seem likely to harm many ordinary Cubans, including about 22,000 who signed up to welcome visitors into their homes via Airbnb. The company says these entrepreneurs earned about $40 million last year.

The Obama opening also has increased the access Cubans have to the internet. If these arrangements are left in place they could prove to be one of the greatest tools in creating greater understanding between Cuba and the US.

Mr. Trump is right in saying that the Castro regime – headed by Fidel’s brother, Raúl, since 2008 – continues to oppress the Cuban people. One human rights group recorded nearly 10,000 people who had been arbitrarily detained by the Cuban government last year.

But whether the new  modest rollback in relations with Cuba will do anything more than please the dwindling number of Cuban-Americans who demand a hard line against the Castros remains to be seen. It could just as easily stiffen the resolve of the Cuban government to stay the course as promote reforms.

In the long run the Trump policy may be seen as one step back in a relationship that keeps building momentum to move forward.


A Christian Science Perspective

About this feature

Each weekday, the Monitor includes one clearly labeled religious article offering spiritual insight on contemporary issues, including the news. The publication – in its various forms – is produced for anyone who cares about the progress of the human endeavor around the world and seeks news reported with compassion, intelligence, and an essentially constructive lens. For many, that caring has religious roots. For many, it does not. The Monitor has always embraced both audiences. The Monitor is owned by a church – The First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Boston – whose founder was concerned with both the state of the world and the quality of available news.

As mayor of his city, Patrick McCreary met with people who were unhappy with the city or its public services. One day when an angry constituent was yelling at him, he silently prayed along these lines: “Father, tell me what to do. Help me know what to say. You are all-intelligence, all-power, all-loving, governing all.” Then words came to him that calmed the woman and she began to weep. Ways were found to meet her need. Mr. McCreary sees a relationship between public service and divine service, which includes listening for God’s guidance and letting divine Love inspire our efforts to serve others.


A message of love

Hannah McKay/Reuters
Specialists inspect the cladding on a tower at the Chalcots Estate complex in north London today. The local council said it had decided to proceed with the removal of the cladding after an independent review, begun in the aftermath of the fatal fire earlier this month at London’s Grenfell Tower. Councils around the country reported that at least two dozen buildings were fitted with aluminium-composite cladding, The Guardian reported. Other forms of cladding were also being examined.
( The illustrations in today’s Monitor Daily are by Jacob Turcotte. )

A look ahead

Thanks for joining us today. Come back tomorrow: We’re working on a story about China's reforestation efforts and why credible progress is more complex than it may first appear. 

More issues

2017
June
27
Tuesday

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.