The hard knocks of rocketry

A string of failures in space exploration is a lesson in the lessening of limitations.

|
NASA via AP
The Athena lander approaches the moon March 6.

It would seem that the past year in space exploration has been one defined significantly by failure.

One year ago, Intuitive Machines became the first private company to land a spacecraft on the moon, but Odysseus ended up on its side, cutting the mission short. Earlier this month, its second moon lander, Athena, did the exact same thing, meaning it could not deploy its rover.

On March 6, for the second consecutive launch, SpaceX’s Starship rocket lost control and exploded after reaching space.

Next week, NASA hopes to change this gloomy trajectory. Last August, it stranded two astronauts on the International Space Station when the Boeing Starliner spacecraft developed technical problems. It hopes to soon launch a mission to bring them back.

If Shakespeare were to pen a play on the topic, he could fairly write that the course of space exploration never did run smooth. SpaceX founder Elon Musk – a man usually brimful of confidence – recently conceded, “Rockets are hard.”

Failure is never cause for celebration. When humans sit atop rockets, failure is inadmissible. Yet the recent spate of failures tells a different tale. It tells of a renewed effort to do something difficult, and the new possibilities, hopes, and frontiers on the other side of that barrier.

“In the high-stakes world of space exploration, failures aren’t just accidents – they’re critical learning opportunities,” wrote contributor Ivan Yatskov in Orbital Today.

For decades after the curtain went up on the Space Age, exploration was the exclusive province of governments. In the United States, NASA was cautious and had accountability as a government agency, but there were drawbacks. Human space exploration largely stagnated during the three-decade shuttle program. And at one time, so many NASA missions to Mars failed that the red planet gained a reputation as a spacecraft graveyard.

Now, both new nations and new companies like Intuitive Machines are entering the scene. There are challenges. The past year shows the need to build up technical know-how. But as ever, these efforts are about more than space. They are about loosening humanity’s sense of limitation.

“Overcoming our limits is what is hard to do. It’s not about the rocket equation, it’s not about physics – we solve those issues every single day,” said Rick Tumlinson of the SpaceFund in a 2015 TEDx Talk. “Everyday, something that was science fiction ... turns into reality. It’s an amazing time, and it’s accelerating.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to The hard knocks of rocketry
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2025/0313/The-hard-knocks-of-rocketry
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe