Gaza’s destiny, chosen by its people

As big powers plot the territory’s future, a survey in Gaza points to possible religious dialogue.

|
AP
Palestinians perform Friday prayers at the damaged Great Omari Mosque, Feb. 14.

For nearly two decades, the people in Gaza have not been able to vote for new leaders. They were stuck with Hamas. Yet as they return to war-battered communities under a month-old ceasefire with Israel, many are voicing strong views on Gaza’s future – as if an election were nigh.

At present, that hope is a distant one. Instead, from Washington to Cairo, international actors are debating Gaza’s future – without much input from the territory’s 2.1 million inhabitants.

So exactly what do these Palestinians really want? Based on a survey in early January, they are holding on to their religious identity, as well as to an attachment to the land and Palestinian unity. With Palestinians having little faith in their past or present leader – only a fifth now support Hamas – that religious identity may open a door for dialogue and direction.

About half expect peace to prevail, while 44% expect a long-term truce. The survey, conducted for the research group Artis International and Oxford University, tried to gauge how the people’s “spiritual strength” might influence potential compromises with Israel.

Although people in Gaza view the conflict with Israel in religious terms, that belief “does not necessarily imply intolerance of other groups,” wrote two researchers about the survey, Scott Atran and Ángel Gómez, in Foreign Affairs.

They cited a previous survey in which Palestinian Muslim youths appeared to place much greater value on the lives of Palestinians than on those of Jewish Israelis. “Yet when they were asked to take the viewpoint of Allah (God), they valued the two more equally,” they wrote.

Injecting more religion into Middle East conflicts may seem fraught. Yet during the height of Hamas-Israel fighting last year, Gaza’s most prominent Muslim scholar, Salman Al-Dayah, issued an edict urging Hamas to “be humble” and “fear Allah” for, among other issues, using civilians as human shields. He stated the people had an increasing aversion to Islam because “of the religious who caused this calamity.”

For both Israelis and Palestinians, “Faith very similarly informs rhetoric, convictions, and actions,” wrote Michal Bar-Asher Siegal, a professor of rabbinic Judaism at Ben-Gurion University, in The Jerusalem Post.  “We need to talk much more about God,” especially for a society “striving to discern and live according to what it believes God wants from it.”

“We need to critically examine how the concept of God is constructed in different cultures and explore the ways in which religious leaders use sacred texts to shape ideologies and influence communities.” Such understanding, she added, can then foster “meaningful dialogue between diverse communities.”

Perhaps for people in Gaza, a self-reflection about their religious identity has begun. As big powers plot Gaza’s next steps, they might want to check first with the territory’s residents.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Gaza’s destiny, chosen by its people
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2025/0218/Gaza-s-destiny-chosen-by-its-people
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe