Europe’s election: The art of listening

While the right made gains in the European Parliament, both sides showed a willingness to listen to disillusioned voters.

|
AP
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen attends a press conference in Berlin, Germany, June 10, the day after the election for the European Parliament.

In a year of big elections worldwide, one of the biggest – with 27 countries voting for a new European Parliament June 6-9 – has just delivered a message similar to those of other recent contests: Voters want leaders to try harder to define a political center.

While right-wing parties made gains in the Continent-wide vote – even forcing a parliamentary election in France in a few weeks – the real story is how much politicians of both the left and the right have been listening to disillusioned voters across Europe, from angry farmers to young people fed up with established parties.

In Germany, for example, a centrist party founded just six months ago by a former leftist leader, Sahra Wagenknecht, won 6% of the vote for the 720-strong European Parliament. In Italy, the party of right-wing Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni did well but only after she moderated her views on migration, support for Ukraine, and the European Union. In France, the leader of the far-right National Rally, Marine Le Pen, has learned to accept the Eurocurrency.

Most of all, the center-right party of European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen held its own as the Parliament’s major force – after moderating its green policies and tightening migration flows. The election result, said the commission leader, “comes with great responsibility for the parties in the center.”

Being meek enough to listen to voters might pay off. Ms. von der Leyen is expected to be chosen for another five-year term, although much depends on the political parties in Parliament that have repositioned their views and are willing to accommodate each other.

Ms. von der Leyen once worked under longtime German chancellor Angela Merkel, who advised leaders to find a political space within which “different interests can be balanced and compromises reached.” Ms. Merkel also said the best leaders have an inner compass “that is based on overarching values.”

Europe’s identity relies less on victories for the left or right than on how well EU leaders listen to voters who feel left behind – the ones prone to back extremists. “The political earthquakes in Europe are more than just electoral shifts,” wrote pundit Diego Fassnacht in the Asia Times after the election. “As traditional power structures face challenges, new alliances and priorities are emerging.”

And EU leaders again learn that the art of consensus-based decision-making depends how well they listen.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Europe’s election: The art of listening
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2024/0610/Europe-s-election-The-art-of-listening
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe