Resetting the House

The election of a new Republican speaker puts civility first in style of leadership.

|
Reuters
Newly elected Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) is congratulated by Republican members of Congress on the outer steps of the House of Representatives after being elected the new Speaker Oct. 25.

After three weeks of trying, Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives rallied behind the selection of a new speaker, but not out of any consensus on policy matters. The majority party remains fragmented into factions and factions within factions. The GOP lawmakers appear instead to have been drawn together by a different gravitational force.

“I believe that they trust Mike Johnson,” Dusty Johnson, a Republican representative from South Dakota, told a British journalist yesterday. He recalled how, when he arrived in Congress as a new member four years ago, “Mike Johnson came to my office ... and talked to me about how important civility was in this place, how even when we disagree with our colleagues on the other side of the aisle, we should try to do it as people who have good faith and good intention with decency.”

The American experiment in democracy was designed by its founders to forge consensus from what the late Arizona Sen. John McCain called “this big, boisterous, brawling, intemperate, restless ... good and magnificent country.” Rules govern the legislative process, but the hard-knuckle work of fellow citizens governing together more often depends on softer currencies of humility and respect.

The most conspicuous example of such trust-building is the affection forged over decades between President Joe Biden and Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell during Mr. Biden’s time in that chamber. “There is a personal relationship that – transcends isn’t the right word – but that is different from their philosophical leanings,” Sen. Susan Collins of Maine observed earlier this year. “And my experience has been that personal relationships count in this setting.”

Mr. Johnson’s election to lead the narrowly divided House offers a new opportunity to test that observation. The Louisiana Republican and his leadership counterpart, Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries, share almost nothing in common on major issues. As an outspoken skeptic of the 2020 election results, Mr. Johnson starts with a deficit of trust across the aisle. Yet the two leaders may find a ready adhesive in shared values. Both speak in tones of civility. Marshall Jones, the Democrat who ran against Mr. Johnson in his race for Congress in 2016, described his former opponent as “a good listener” in an interview with the Louisiana Illuminator yesterday.
In his last speech in the Senate in 2017, Mr. McCain spoke of democracy’s “principled mindset.” It hinges on “humility, on our need to cooperate, on our dependence on each other to learn how to trust each other again and by so doing better serve the people who elected us.”
After three weeks and three false starts, the House has a new leader. Mr. Johnson is not the policy moderate Democrats hoped would emerge. But his hand on the gavel may signal a renewal of warmth that Washington needs.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Resetting the House
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2023/1026/Resetting-the-House
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe