Skip to footer
Respect
The Monitor's View

Win for democracy in a Polish medley

An election in Poland results in a victory for three parties working together to end the ruling party’s drift toward authoritarianism.

|
AP
Supporters of Donald Tusk, a former Polish prime minister, celebrate at the headquarters of his party, Civic Platform, in Warsaw, Poland, Oct. 15.
  • By the Monitor's Editorial Board

When a democracy descends toward autocracy, sometimes not winning is a win. That helps explain comments from the leader of Poland’s Civic Platform party following one of Europe’s most consequential elections this year.

“I have never been so happy in my life as I am with this second place,” said Donald Tusk after Poles voted – in record turnout – for a new Parliament last Sunday.

While his party achieved a stronger showing than in the past, it also demonstrated something missing in the top vote-getter, the ruling Law and Justice party, known by its acronym PiS. Mr. Tusk’s party had made a pre-election pact with two other parties to restore freedom for news media and independence for the judiciary – both of which PiS had eroded over eight years in power.

“Poland won. Democracy won,” explained Mr. Tusk, a former president of the European Council. The combined votes of the three parties are expected to allow them to form a majority in Parliament, although the political horse-trading could take months and PiS may use its entrenched power to fight back.

While the election dealt with a host of hot issues, many voters rewarded the three parties for not treating one another as the enemy. Instead, the parties politely engaged so they might preserve the virtues of political pluralism or, in the words of the United States motto, “e pluribus unum.”

Those virtues include the humility to listen to different views and the goodwill to treat opponents in a way that one wants to be treated. That essence of democracy – nurturing mutual trust despite lively debates – has been in decline not only in Poland but also in Hungary. Both countries have faced European Union sanctions for their threats to democracy and the unity of the 27-member bloc.

Democracies gain when citizens cherish their engagement in discussing alternative views and when they remain open to self-correction. Demonizing opponents prevents an opportunity to refine the best ideas for shared purpose.

“There seems to be an assumption that what has won in Poland is liberalism, because illiberalism has lost, but actually what has won is pluralism,” Ben Stanley, a political scientist at SWPS University in Warsaw, wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter.

Or as Mr. Tusk, the second-place winner, put it, “We won our beloved democracy.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Win for democracy in a Polish medley
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2023/1017/Win-for-democracy-in-a-Polish-medley
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe