A truth-bearing defense against China

Democracies like Taiwan are learning from each other on how to reinforce their values against attempts to divide through digital propaganda.

|
Reuters
Taiwan's President Tsai Ing-wen speaks with members of the Taiwanese community in New York City, March 30.

The president of Taiwan, Tsai Ing-wen, made a rare visit to the United States on Thursday and delivered this message in a speech: Her island nation’s democratic values are in peril from authoritarian “belligerence.” China, in other words, is challenging Taiwan from within – using disinformation and misinformation to undercut values such as freedom and rule of law – even more than by threatening a military invasion.

Her words were timely. At this week’s second Summit for Democracy of some 120 countries, much of the discussion was on ways to counter what Ms. Tsai calls “cognitive warfare” on the internet. The first summit was held in 2021 before Russia’s war in Ukraine. Since then, that war has shown how the resiliency of Ukrainians in rebutting Russian digital propaganda with transparency and accurate information can help their war effort. As U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said at the summit, democracies must deal with disinformation and misinformation in a way “that brings truth to bear.”

Taiwan, which holds a presidential election early next year, feels some urgency to improve its democratic shield against China. A year ago, the Chinese military issued a new doctrine that said warfare “depends mainly on information to subdue an enemy.” Ms. Tsai has set up a ministry for digital affairs as well as a national institute of cybersecurity. She also plans to set up low-Earth-orbit satellite internet service in case China cuts undersea cables.

Yet Taiwan’s real strength against Chinese propaganda lies in its citizen-led fact-checking groups, such as MyGoPen, Cofacts, and Taiwan FactCheck Center, that correct false information online or in the news media.

“These organizations form a collaborative safety net to shield Taiwan’s unique information space and vulnerable democracy,” write scholars Chiaoning Su and Wei-Ping Li in Taiwan Insight. “Taiwan’s fact-checking practices offer a timely and fitting lesson as China becomes increasingly bold in its cyber intrusions.”

In addition, Taiwan uses Polis, an online discussion platform, to allow its citizens to weigh in on public topics. “The idea is that if everyone is talking in a reasonable way, according to transparent rules of online debate, then conspiracy theories don’t spread so quickly,” reports The Atlantic magazine.

The nation’s digital minister, Audrey Tang, describes the strategy as “official resilience for all.” The power of collective intelligence at work in digital public spaces helps reinforce cohesion and collaboration.

“We can empower the voices reaching across ideological divides and uncover our shared values in plain sight,” she said in a video at the summit. For Taiwan, those values may mean less peril from a belligerent foe across the Taiwan Strait. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to A truth-bearing defense against China
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2023/0331/A-truth-bearing-defense-against-China
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe