A heap of coups challenges Africa

When some countries welcome military rule, the continent rethinks how to better nurture democracy.

|
Reuters
A spokesman, Captain Sidsore Kader Ouedraogo, announces that the Army has taken control in Burkina Faso, Jan. 24.

From East Africa to West Africa in recent months, more than half a dozen power grabs by military forces have brought tens of thousands of citizens onto the streets. Yet there’s a twist. In Sudan, protesters are demanding civilian-led democratic rule while in Mali and Burkina Faso, people are actually celebrating the mutineers. If that sounds like a contradiction, look again.

These divergent reactions reflect a similar and popular expectation in Africa. People want honest, effective government. As one marcher celebrating the military takeover in the capital city Ouagadougou told The Guardian, “This is an opportunity for Burkina Faso to retain its integrity.” The two sets of demonstrators differ over the means to achieve such governance due to the different threats they face, but their demands for it show how vested ordinary Africans have become in democracy.

Africa’s answers to its coup tendencies could be part of the problem. In the 1990s when coups were common, leaders on the continent decided to build blocs of countries centered around trade or security to promote economic opportunity, safety, and rule of law. The premise was that shared standards of governance, enforced by multilateral forces, could bolster democracy. That mostly worked until the recent coups – 11 successful or attempted ones in the last year and a half.

In Mali and Burkina Faso, many people blame a regional body, the Economic Community of West African States, for failing to hold their leaders to agreed standards of governance and then punishing their societies with economic sanctions in response to military takeovers. Public opinion in Mali, which has seen two coups since August 2020, reflects that frustration.

The latest survey by Afrobarometer found that 64% of Malians said they prefer democracy over any alternative form of government and even more, 69%, reject military rule. At the same time, only 38% said they trusted the last civilian government while 82% found the military reliable. A large majority said the economy was on the wrong track.

The sentiments reflect two primary indicators of poor governance in the region: corruption and insecurity. Mali, Burkina Faso, and other neighboring countries consistently rank poorly on global indexes for corruption. At the same time, a security crisis posed by violent extremists has worsened despite regional and international efforts to halt it. The region saw a 70% increase in violence linked to Islamist groups last year from the year before, according to the Africa Center for Strategic Studies in Washington.

“The military has many people’s confidence,” Ibrahima Maiga, co-founder of the Movement to Save Burkina Faso, a prominent protest group, told The Guardian. “We love freedom, democracy, yes. But we are here at the level that we are trying to survive. The most important thing is providing safety and security.”

Harvard University scholar David Moss writes, “Democracy is indeed more like a living, breathing organism than a machine built to specification. It needs to actively work against corrosive forces, both moral and institutional, or succumb to them.” In West Africa, as in Sudan, corruption and security failure are core grievances driving citizens to flip the script of progress in Africa. Yet in their demands for good governance, they are showing that democracy cannot be engineered by outsiders. Each society must nurture integrity and strength from within.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to A heap of coups challenges Africa
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2022/0208/A-heap-of-coups-challenges-Africa
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe