One reason to trust in democracy’s resilience

The life of South Africa’s Desmond Tutu displayed the power of persistent good.

|
AP/File
Desmond Tutu speaks to University of Oklahoma graduates in Norman, Okla., after receiving a honorary degree in 2000.

Amid a gradual erosion of liberalism around the world, the life of South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu offers a reminder of the powerful effect of persistent good.

So far in this young decade, each year has opened with an event reflecting the state of democracy somewhere in the world. In 2020 Hong Kong police clashed with protesters, who rallied in the hundreds of thousands on New Year’s Day to champion universal suffrage. 

Last year supporters of President Donald Trump mounted a violent insurrection at the U.S. Capitol Jan. 6 to try to block Congress from certifying an election that he had lost.

This year the trend continued – not with tear gas and batons but rather with a quieter opportunity to ponder the long arc of humanity’s pursuit of democratic ideals. Amid warnings that the world is tilting more and more toward autocracy, even in democracy’s strongholds, tributes from around the globe marked the passing of Archbishop Tutu, an exemplification of persistent good.

One of the champions of justice and human rights during South Africa’s long struggle against apartheid, Archbishop Tutu understood that no human system based on hate and exclusion could withstand the power of moral courage. 

“He knew in his soul that good would triumph over evil, that justice would prevail over iniquity, and that reconciliation would prevail over revenge and recrimination,” said South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. “He knew that apartheid would end, that democracy would come. ... He was convinced, even to the end of his life, that poverty, hunger, and misery can be defeated – that all people can live together in peace, security, and comfort.”

In the days since Mr. Tutu’s death Dec. 26, the question has been posed whether anyone today, in South Africa or elsewhere, is equal in stature to those like Archbishop Tutu, whose lives were forged by the great crucibles of justice in the 20th century – men and women such as Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King Jr., Andrei Sakharov, and Helen Suzman.

The desire for new champions is understandable in the face of the challenges of climate change, an erosion of democratic norms, persistent racial injustice, and ongoing threats to human rights. History will surely record new names such as Alexei Navalny and Greta Thunberg. More will emerge.

For Mr. Tutu, who matched undaunted moral courage with an equal measure of humility, the cause of human progress found its deepest reservoirs of hope and strength in taking action, even modest steps. 

“Do your little bit of good where you are,” he said. “It’s those little bits of good put together that overwhelm the world.”

The coming year holds significant challenges for democracy. Elections in places like the United States, Hungary, India, South Korea, Brazil, and France will test the durability of constitutional norms, fair ballot practices, and the allure of authoritarian populism. There may be forward steps here and backward steps there. 

The assurance that humanity’s progress toward greater equality and universal dignity will continue will always reside most safely in each individual’s capacity for self-government, reason, and conscience.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to One reason to trust in democracy’s resilience
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2022/0104/One-reason-to-trust-in-democracy-s-resilience
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe