Skip to footer

Afghan triumphs drive Afghan truce

A tentative agreement sets an initial trust-building goal of a seven-day “reduction in violence” between the Taliban and the U.S. Then difficult talks begin, supported by the Afghan people’s embrace of their democratic progress.

|
AP
Hawa Alam Nuristani, election chief in Afghanistan, announces the results of the presidential election Feb. 18.
  • By the Monitor's Editorial Board

Women in Afghanistan now attend university in record numbers. In the capital, Kabul, a fast-food restaurant just introduced the country’s first robotic waiter. On Tuesday, officials announced the results of a presidential election – the fourth since the ouster of the Taliban. And in the latest survey, 64% of Afghans say they believe reconciliation with the Taliban is possible, a jump of 11 percentage points in only one year.

Since the United States-led invasion 18 years ago, Afghanistan has experienced slow and uneven progress toward a free and democratic society. Attacks by the rural-based Taliban remain high. Yet progress is palpable enough that it partly explains why the U.S. and Taliban are ready to ink an agreement on a pathway for peace.

For now, the details of the proposed agreement are less important than its initial requirement: a seven-day “reduction of violence” between U.S. and Taliban forces. The limited truce, which could start in coming days, will be a test of credibility for Taliban leaders. Can they control their lower ranks? Will they eventually keep a total cease-fire?

Over 18 years, Afghan society has changed enough that perhaps the Taliban know they must earn people’s trust rather than impose their harsh Islamist ways. Or as Afghan President Ashraf Ghani challenged the militant group: “If people elect you dogcatcher, then I would say you really have a power base. Guns are not the basis of power.”

If the short “reduction in violence” period succeeds, it might inspire confidence for a sequence of other trust-building steps, such as the start of a partial withdrawal of U.S. troops and an exchange of prisoners by the Taliban and Afghan government. The most significant step would be the Taliban starting direct talks with Mr. Ghani’s elected government.

These “intra-Afghan” talks would imply a tacit approval by the Taliban of a willingness to work within a democracy and its acknowledgment of how much Afghans support – 87% according to the survey – the rights and liberties of their constitution.

The Taliban may finally be accepting the limits of fighting to achieve their aims. In the U.S., both President Donald Trump and his Democratic rivals for the White House seek to end America’s longest war. Yet it is the Afghans themselves, in how they have been able to improve their lives and how much they cherish their civic rights, who are setting the table for the difficult and complex talks ahead. Afghans may be divided by ethnic feuding and divided politics. Yet their preference for reconciliation and for the protection of their democratic achievements is clear. It will be difficult to ignore their preferences during the negotiations.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Afghan triumphs drive Afghan truce
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2020/0218/Afghan-triumphs-drive-Afghan-truce
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe