Giving is way up, but for what reason?

An unexpected rebound in giving in the US so soon after the recession is attributed to a healthier economy. But one study finds other, less material motives for generosity.

|
REUTERS
Musician Josh Groban attends the Red Nose Charity event in New York May 21..

A new survey of charitable donations in the United States finds that giving is taking off. Total philanthropy rose 5.4 percent in 2014, a big jump in any year. But the high level of giving was unexpected by most experts, coming so soon after a steep decline during the recent Great Recession.

The recovery in donations was the strongest of any period after a recession in the past 40 years, according to Indiana University’s Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, which conducts the annual study known as Giving USA. And total giving in 2014 set a record at $358.4 billion. Giving has risen nearly sixfold over the past six decades (after taking inflation into account).

The report claims this latest good news is “indicative of a healthier economy.” Perhaps. More Americans do have a greater amount of disposable income to share than they did a few years ago. But researchers have lately begun to probe people’s motives for magnanimity. Some ascribe it to evolution and genes. Others cite changing social pressures, such as a rise or fall in religious faith. (The survey finds religious giving as a percentage of total gifts has dropped from 56 percent three decades ago to 33 percent in recent years.)

Notre Dame sociologist Christian Smith, coauthor of the recent book “The Paradox of Generosity,” notes that scholars have yet to prove that altruistic acts come from selfish motives, such as the paradoxical expression “to give is to receive.” Based on a survey of thousands of Americans, Dr. Smith finds that “humans are not just rational egoists out to maximize their own prestige, power, or wealth.”

Rather, he finds generosity depends to a large degree on a person’s perception of “living in a world of abundance, blessing, gratitude, enjoyment, security, and sharing.” Those that see the world as a threat or full of scarcity give less even though they have a similar financial ability to give, according to their survey.

What does he suggest can help increase giving, either in money, time, skills, or relationships?

Yes, donors need timely reminders to give and they give more when they see the fruits of their charity. Social pressure helps, too. But he writes that American culture needs to stop pounding home a message of scarcity, discontent, and insecurity.

“[R]eal generosity requires learning something different, something that may not feel natural for many people. It often requires real personal change. A better understanding of how generosity works can aid that learning and change.”

In other words, those that give tend to see themselves as already blessed, rather than rely on being blessed by giving. Perhaps coming surveys by Giving USA might want to ask if Americans are acting on that basis instead of a healthier economy.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Giving is way up, but for what reason?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2015/0616/Giving-is-way-up-but-for-what-reason
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe