Skip to footer

After a divisive election, Israel needs 'to heal'

The March 17 election was a victory for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. But the harsh campaign left too many rips in Israeli society and in ties with the US. Much mending will be needed.

|
AP Photo
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prays at the Western Wall in Jerusalem March 18 after his right-wing Likud Party scored a victory in Israel’s election.
  • By the Monitor's Editorial Board

Israel’s election on March 17 was one of its most divisive in its modern history, with sharper-than-usual name-calling and dirty tactics. The campaign even spilled over to the United States with a tendentious speech to Congress by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. His party ended up winning the most seats (30) in the 120-seat Knesset. But as a dozen or more political parties now jockey to form a ruling coalition, a few key leaders saw a need to mend Israel itself, as well as its damaged ties with its main foreign partners.

Israeli President Reuven Rivlin, who can guide formation of a governing coalition in parliament, called for a unity government between the top two winning parties: the rightist Likud of Mr. Netanyahu and the center-left Zionist Union of Isaac Herzog. The purpose, said Mr. Rivlin, would be to “prevent the rapid disintegration of Israeli democracy and additional elections in a short time.”

He was supported by another leader with similar influence, Moshe Kahlon, party chief of Kulanu (“all of us”). His party won a surprising 10 seats, making it a possible kingmaker in the Knesset. After an election campaign with an unprecedented number of clashes, schisms, and smears, Mr. Kahlon said that now is the time for Israel “to heal, to unite.”

“We want to find the common denominator that binds us together. It is time for reconciliation among us,” he said.

Netanyahu certainly has some mending to do as he heads toward a fourth term as prime minister.

During the harsh campaign, he offended Arab Israelis, who make up 20 percent of the population, with a comment that seemed racist. Arab Israelis, who for the first time united under a single slate of parties, did unusually well in the election.

He also upset his personal ties with President Obama – not only by making a speech to Congress in which he challenged the US administration’s talks with Iran but also by backtracking during the campaign on his previous support for a two-state solution with the Palestinians living under Israeli control.

In addition, he will need to patch up relations with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, who may be left wondering if Israel wants a negotiated peace deal.

Israel’s democracy is always lively, and serves as a model for the Middle East. But now it must also be a model for restoring national harmony.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to After a divisive election, Israel needs 'to heal'
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2015/0318/After-a-divisive-election-Israel-needs-to-heal
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe