Passing the torch of peaceful protests

The 50th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act is also a chance to note how often peaceful protests for basic freedoms still find traction in many places in the world.

|
AP Photo
Pro-democracy protesters gather in Hong Kong July 1 to push peacefully for greater democracy. The protest came after nearly 800,000 residents voted in a mock referendum aimed at bolstering support for full democracy.

On July 2, Americans celebrated the 50th anniversary of the signing of the Civil Rights Act. The 1964 law was a milestone for democratic freedom in the United States. Equally worthy for celebration, however, were the years of nonviolent protests across the South that led up to the landmark law. Those peaceful tactics still serve as a model today for democracy activists around the world.

In Hong Kong, for example, hundreds of thousands of demonstrators marched peacefully July 1 to demand China allow a wide range of candidates in the election of the territory’s chief executive in 2017. In the days before the protest, pro-democracy activists held an unofficial referendum on the nomination process. Nearly a quarter of Hong Kong voters participated.

In Venezuela, too, ongoing protests against President Nicolás Maduro’s government have largely been peaceful. A key protest leader, Leopoldo Lopez, who was inspired by the tactics of Nelson Mandela, Mohandas Gandhi, and Martin Luther King Jr., remains in jail. And in a report last month, Human Rights Watch tallied up dozens of attacks on protesters by security forces.

In the Middle East, the pro-democracy protests that began peacefully in 2011 have mostly failed, with Tunisia being the one exception among the countries that had Arab Spring uprisings. Syria’s nonviolent protesters were overtaken by violent jihadists, leading to a self-proclaimed “Islamic state” straddling Iraq and Syria. In Egypt, protesters who at first achieved democracy lost power to the authoritarian Muslim Brotherhood and later the Army.

In Libya, a leading advocate of peaceful protest, Salwa Bughaighis, was killed June 25 in Benghazi as the North African country tries to salvage a chaotic and barely democratic situation. As a human rights lawyer, Ms. Bughaighis stood up to both the dictator Muammar Qaddafi and Islamist groups.

Keeping violence at bay while struggling for democracy is a hard cause to maintain. Often, authoritarian regimes seek to break the attraction of peaceful demonstrations. In Ukraine, for example, protests last fall were attacked by a Russia-backed regime that only exposed its own brutality and led to its downfall. Now with democracy restored, the newly elected President Petro Poroshenko has tried to bring about a truce with violent pro-Russia separatists in the east. But as the rebels continued their violence, he has had to send in the Army while also asking civilians to use “civil disobedience to the so-called people’s republics.”

The history of nonviolent “freedom fighters” offers up many lessons for today’s activists. One lesson comes from Aung San Suu Kyi, leader of the democracy movement in Myanmar (Burma). She says that “fear is the first adversary we have to get past when we set out to battle for freedom, and often it is the one that remains until the very end.” During years of detention, she learned how to remain steadfast in the cause for freedom “because my mind had always been free.”

Similar ideas led to the Civil Rights Act, the liberation of white-ruled South Africa, and democratic revolutions from Latin America to the former Soviet states. When peaceful acts of protests do succeed, they help reveal the emptiness of any governance run by fear, exclusion, or injustice.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Passing the torch of peaceful protests
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2014/0702/Passing-the-torch-of-peaceful-protests
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe