Children on the doorstep

A surge of unaccompanied children crossing illegally into the US demands a humanitarian response

|
Jose Luis Gonzalez/Reuters
Two girls stand in a shelter in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, for underage Mexicans and Central Americans who have been prevented from crossing the US border or sent back after entering the US illegally. Tens of thousands of unaccompanied children are flooding across the southern US border illegally, forcing both a humanitarian crisis and a budget dilemma.

Someone leaves a child on your doorstep and rings the bell. You don’t just slam the door and turn away. You take care of the child, at least until a more permanent home can be found.

But then a second child arrives, and a third, and a fourth. Times are hard, and more and more children nearby are being driven from their homes by crime and poverty. You wonder if you’ve gotten a reputation as a softhearted neighbor.

But you also know you still have to help.

Some 60,000 children, unaccompanied by any adult, are expected to pour into the United States illegally this year, the Obama administration estimates, 10 times the number estimated as recently as 2011. Since Oct. 1, an unprecedented 47,017 unaccompanied children have been caught trying to cross the Southwestern border of the US alone.

The number has leapt so quickly that it has overloaded the ability of the US to respond. The White House and the United Nations have both declared the influx a humanitarian crisis.

Many of the children don’t come from Mexico but from farther south in Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala. They often arrive at the border by bus or by jumping on freight trains headed north. They pay “coyotes” – sometimes members of criminal gangs – to help them sneak across the US border. An unknown number don’t make it and perish.

The improving US economy accounts for a part of the general influx of undocumented immigrants of all ages coming to the US seeking better lives.

But why so many children, and why now? What kind of parents would send their offspring alone on such a perilous journey?

Some parents are already working in the US and desperately want their children to join them. Other youngsters are escaping wretched home lives and abuse. In many cases they are choosing to try to run away to the US rather than be forced to join one of the many criminal gangs that control neighborhoods in their homelands.

Some observers suggest that the US has earned a reputation in Latin American countries for being “soft” on undocumented women and children, a policy, they say, that only encourages more of them to cross the border. Some of the children are being allowed to join family members already in the US legally. Others are being passed along to private aid organizations for temporary shelter.

Politicians in both US political parties, as well as private aid agencies, wonder how the US will be able to afford to care for such an influx of vulnerable children and, in some cases, their mothers. The cost of dealing with children entering the US illegally is expected to rise to $2 billion in 2015, up from $868 million in 2014, the Obama administration estimates.

It is in the nature of Americans – as well as in American self-interest – to want to help improve, through aid and diplomacy, the economic and political situations  south of its border so that fewer desperate individuals, including children, will try to cross into the US illegally. The US can also try to put a stronger fence around its “yard” to keep unwanted immigrants and their problems outside.

But once a child is here, on the doorstep, Americans know that bringing that child inside and providing help is their only choice.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Children on the doorstep
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2014/0604/Children-on-the-doorstep
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe