Britain's battle against online porn
In a recent survey of British teens, a third said online pornography now shapes their everyday romantic relationships. This only confirms an insight by Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Sherry Turkle that new technologies such as tablets and smart phones should be judged “not for what they do for us but what they do to us, to our ways of thinking about ourselves.”
The poll also helps confirm the wisdom of a new campaign by British Prime Minister David Cameron aimed at restricting access to online pornography by children. Announced in July, his plan is making progress in pushing Internet providers to offer broadband customers an explicit choice on whether to opt in to Internet porn.
The Internet started more than two decades ago, and since then broadband companies have become passive purveyors of porn to kids. “Too often in the past we have been happy to say ‘anything goes,’ ” said British Culture Secretary Maria Miller in a speech last week. “Well – it doesn’t.”
Britain’s new Web filters will be voluntary, thus skirting free-speech concerns but nonetheless putting up new digital road bumps. In the United States, children start to access hard-core pornography at an average age of 11, according to the activist group Enough Is Enough, while four out of five 16-year-olds regularly look at Web porn.
Britain’s Conservative-led government is also now reportedly asking credit-card companies to stop providing financial services to porn sites that allow access to children. Such a measure would add another layer of protection and reduce the ability of teens to get around the new filters. In a parallel effort, the government is working with search engines such as Google to block access to porn sites depicting sex scenes with children.
Mr. Cameron’s campaign is popular with a majority of British adults – women more than men – despite the legal or technical hurdles in the effort. And in that survey of children, 7 in 10 said they want schools to educate them about the effects of online pornography.
“We must speak to young people about what healthy, meaningful and respectful relationships are before their views are warped by the prism of online porn,” states Britain’s National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children.
Cameron’s plan has a broad aim beyond blocking pornography. “We now have the ambition to make Britain the most family-friendly democracy in the world,” said Claire Perry, a member of Parliament leading the campaign.
The plan’s critics claim it won’t work or might lead to censorship. But says Floella Benjamin, a Liberal Democrat member of the House of Lords, the dark side of the Internet – the sexualization of children – has crossed a sacred line.
In a new British documentary titled “InRealLife” released last month, filmmaker Beeban Kidron shows the effects of the Internet on teenagers by focusing on one boy who admits an addiction to online porn but laments that “it’s ruined the whole sense of love.”
“It hurts me, because I find now that it’s so hard for me to actually feel a connection for a girl,” he states.
Cameron’s campaign aims to ensure young people put sex in its proper place within a loving, committed relationship. Parents need this help in countering the Internet’s negative effects on teens. If it succeeds, Britain’s campaign could serve as a model for other countries.
